Page 1 of 1

Mormons want illegals...open the borders they say!!!...

Posted: January 16th, 2008, 6:58 pm
by Stephen
This is an article in a paper that is local to me...what do you think...was it really written by an LDS? I'm going to write a response...wanna help!?

http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/Content?oid=612600
Mormon migra

Dear Mexican:

I feel that the more Mexicans who come to this country, the better. I am a Mormon, a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In our Book of Mormon, on page 54, it says on the left side of the page in verse 6: “There shall none come into this land save they shall be brought by the hand of the Lord.” I want as many Mexicans in this country as possible, and then I want to tell them about Joseph Smith and get them baptized and enjoy the blessings of the temple. Come on down—you are welcome by me.

—Love my Brown Brothers


Dear Gabacho: Gracias for your welcoming heart, even if your ulterior motive is stealing Mexicans away from the Virgin of Guadalupe for a religion where Jell-O is the only allowable narcotic. While we’re talking about Moroni worshippers, can you do me a favor and ask Mitt Romney why he’s such an ingrate toward Mexicans? After all, Romney probably would’ve been some Jack Mormon jerk-off if it weren’t for porous fronteras and living in violation of a country’s laws. His great-grandfather Miles Park Romney fled Los Estados Unidos for Mexico during the 1880s to escape American authorities and continue his polygamous ways, while Mitt’s papi, George, was born in Chihuahua and therefore more Mexican than your typical Chicano Studies major. Not only that, but Pancho Villa’s troops were kind enough to not massacre Mormon colonies during the Mexican Revolution, thus allowing the infant George and his family to return home and ensure Mitt’s brilliantined hair would grace America. One final point, Brown Brothers: Por favor, tell Mitt and all other Mexican-hating LDSers that the Book of Mormon requires amnesty for illegals. The above quote you cited came from the Second Book of Nephi and is a wonderful passage, but what about the one before it? Passage 2 Nephi 1:5 tells the Saints that Lehi prophesized about America, “Yea, the Lord hath covenanted this land unto me, and to my children forever, and also all those who should be led out of other countries by the hand of the Lord.” Hear that, Mitt? Let my gente go—into the United States with free health care, por supuesto.

Posted: January 16th, 2008, 7:18 pm
by Proud 2b Peculiar
I can't tell if they are or not.

Seems a lot like Satire to me or Parody whatever the difference is I dunno.

This was really in the paper?

NUTS!

Posted: January 17th, 2008, 4:54 am
by jbalm
If you believe that the entire continent is the promised land, as I do, then the Mexicans are already here. The illegal aliens are just breaking laws.
“There shall none come into this land save they shall be brought by the hand of the Lord.”
Just because someone comes here doesn't mean they are good. If you want to follow the logic of the "Love My Brown Brothers" guy, then the 9/11 hijackers should have been welcomed as well...and the Nazi spies captured on the east coast during WWII...and the British during the War of 1812...and the British during the Revolutionary War...etc.

Posted: January 17th, 2008, 8:40 am
by ChelC
Have him try adopting internationally (took us two years to bring our son home), and then have him stand in line and watch sick Guatemalans wrap around the embassy hoping for a handful of interviews to get a medical visa, all while losing their small income from the market for the day, only to be turned away and try another day.

It's like spitting in my face personally and the faces of countless people I witnessed sacrificing to do it legally when we shrug our shoulders and welcome those who do it illegally. They are line jumpers, they are free loaders, they have no regard for the law of the land, and no desire to earn the respect of citizens who do.

We should fix the system so that it isn't such a circus act to do it legally before we ever think of inviting law breakers into our nation.

Posted: January 17th, 2008, 8:41 am
by ChelC
Also, maybe this guy has no problem with allowing anyone and everyone to break into our temple and go through the sessions? After all, we want everyone to have their ordinances performed!

Posted: January 17th, 2008, 10:19 am
by Army Of Truth
ChelC wrote:Have him try adopting internationally (took us two years to bring our son home), and then have him stand in line and watch sick Guatemalans wrap around the embassy hoping for a handful of interviews to get a medical visa, all while losing their small income from the market for the day, only to be turned away and try another day.

It's like spitting in my face personally and the faces of countless people I witnessed sacrificing to do it legally when we shrug our shoulders and welcome those who do it illegally. They are line jumpers, they are free loaders, they have no regard for the law of the land, and no desire to earn the respect of citizens who do.

We should fix the system so that it isn't such a circus act to do it legally before we ever think of inviting law breakers into our nation.
Well said, ChelC. I agree completely.

Legal Immigrants = Americans
Illiegal Immigrants = Criminals


This cartoon sums up why they come here in the first place. We need to take away their incentive by going back to Constitutional principles and stop this 'creeping socialism'.

Image

Posted: January 17th, 2008, 10:33 am
by lundbaek
Why do you folks think President Bush & Co. are encouraging illegal immigration?

Posted: January 17th, 2008, 10:44 am
by Proud 2b Peculiar
Makes it easier to create one NAU when there as so many that would support the whole open boarders stuff.

It also means that there are more people to spend for, more spending means that they can keep the economy going a little longer.

And I am sure there are more reasons then this.

Posted: January 17th, 2008, 11:16 am
by Army Of Truth
I agree. The NAU is the main reason. That is also why we are not closing our borders but instead are sending border patrol agents to Iraq. It is all part of the NWO agenda of regionalism which makes countries easier to control. NAU, EU, GATT, APEC, NAFTA, these all work to seemlessly create their One World Gov't.

Posted: January 17th, 2008, 4:07 pm
by Bridgey
Isn't it just as easy to join the church in Mexico as it is in the USA? Why do Mexians need to come there to join. I don't understand the guys logic. It isn't like they're in China or the Middle East or anything.

Posted: January 19th, 2008, 12:16 am
by Stephen
This is what I put together...

Dear SN&R,
I just read the “Mormon Migra” article from the Opinions section of the January 10th issue. I feel compelled to reply for perchance a person might read it and think it was accurate. I am inclined to think that the letter from the unnamed author is in reality a sensationalized piece put together by an editorialist who was a little slow for material and has a chip on his shoulder about “Mormons”….or perhaps it was put together by someone who visited our church long enough to pick up a copy of the Book of Mormon and to have someone who is anti-Mormon show him a few scriptures. Of course there is always the possibility that it was actually written by an uninformed member of the LDS church…which possibility absolutely boggles my mind.
I am not a spokesman for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints but there are a few things I can say quite easily in response. Yes we love the Mexican people…we love all of the worlds peoples. It is common knowledge to those that belong to the church that there are more members outside of the US than in. To think that (with the exception of a handful of places on this planet) a person would have to come to the US to hear the gospel is absurd…because we are most everywhere. In fact we have been in Mexico sharing the gospel since 1876!! http://newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng ... -us/mexico While we would love for all people to hear the story of Joseph Smith being called as a prophet of God, to be baptized, and to enjoy the blessings of the temple…to imply that the breaking of our countries immigration laws is needed for that end is entirely unnecessary and wrong.
Our doctrine teaches us to be law abiding. Our church leaders have also long spoken on the need to maintain the sovereignty of our country. America is a choice land that has been set up by our God to be peopled by those whom he chooses to be here. Yes…our Heavenly Father has covenanted this land to the peoples whom He leads here as indicated in the cited scriptures. It is a leap to say that because of that covenant that He somehow condones the breaking of the laws of the land to come here or that that is proof that our doctrine is for amnesty. To my knowledge the church has never made an official statement regarding amnesty.
Next. Calling us Moroni worshippers is an uninformed or intellectually dishonest thing to say. Of course we don’t worship Moroni…and have never made any such statement that we do.
Yes…I admit I do enjoy a good jell-o.
The reply also called us “Mexican hating LDSers”. What in the world is that based on! I don’t get it. Tell that to the some 1,082,427 Mexican members of the church living in Mexico or one of the hundreds of Spanish congregations in the US! They would certainly be surprised to hear of it. Certainly even your letter from a spurious unnamed source tells a story of love and not hate.
One last side note. Mitt Romney is a politician and speaks for himself and not the church. The church does not support candidates. We are encouraged to be actively engaged in politics and are not told who and what to vote for. While Mitt does attend the same church that I do…I do not support him for president. I support Ron Paul. I believe that Ron Paul’s views are the closest to what the heaven inspired founding fathers taught, what the prophets have taught, and just good ole’ common sense.
Thanks,
Stephen Nix

Posted: January 19th, 2008, 12:22 am
by Proud 2b Peculiar
:lol: 8)

Posted: January 19th, 2008, 10:21 am
by SwissMrs&Pitchfire
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,51 ... 89,00.html
(fair use for discussion purposes)
Lawmakers, LDS Church brainstorm brainstorm
By Bob Bernick Jr. and Deborah Bulkeley
Deseret Morning News
Published: January 19, 2008
LDS Church leaders have told legislative bosses that the "element of humanity" should be re-introduced to the state's immigration debates.

Before each general session, GOP and Democratic leaders in the House and Senate sit down separately with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints special affairs committee, a group made up of church general authorities, church public relations officials and their lobbyists, to discuss any items on the minds of both legislators and church leaders.

House Minority Whip David Litvack, D-Salt Lake, said the Democrats' meeting with church officials brought up several issues, but the immigration discussion was the most touching for him personally.

"I interpreted what was said as this: 'Take a step back, be calm, and above all remember that we are dealing with human beings here,"' said Litvack, who is Jewish and has himself called for cooler heads in dealing with the often emotional issue of illegal immigration.

House Majority Leader Dave Clark, R-Santa Clara, a member of the LDS Church himself, said immigration issues did not take up much time in the Republicans' meeting with church leaders. "But they did say we all need to approach this subject with compassion."

When asked about the legislative meetings, church spokesman Rob Howe said, "We communicated our policy ... The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has taken no position regarding currently proposed immigration legislation."

After Congress refused to deal with immigration issues in 2007, more and more states are now stepping up and passing various kinds of laws. Last year, Oklahoma passed a law that makes it a crime to harbor or transport undocumented immigrants and that creates barriers against undocumented immigrants obtaining jobs or public assistance.

In Utah, Sen. Bill Hickman, R-St. George, is drafting a bill modeled after the Oklahoma law. Other lawmakers are working on piecemeal efforts, which included tightening or repealing Utah's driving privilege card, and repealing a 2002 law that allows qualified undocumented students to pay in-state tuition to attend Utah's public colleges and universities.

LDS Church officials "used the word 'call,' they made a call for humanity in immigration" debates and legislation, Litvack said. "We should not demonize" illegal immigrants. "In some cases, the debate has become so ugly, I heard, so hateful and dehumanizing. Let's bring back the element of humanity."

The worldwide church has many Hispanic and Latino members, and the church's missionaries in Latin America are some of the most successful in getting new converts to the church.

Across America, but especially in the West, the tone of immigration debates has, at times, turned harshfully critical of immigrants and of the politicians arguing for what they term reasonable immigration laws.

Especially in the Republican presidential contest, immigration hard-liners have been pushing for tough new laws and policies.

While LDS Church leaders did not support or oppose any specific piece of legislation that may come up in the 2008 Legislature, which convenes Monday for its 45-day general session, Litvack said they did say: "Take a step back, remember that human beings are involved here. As faith leaders in our community they have a concern for all human beings.

"And I certainly appreciated that. I was glad they spoke out on this topic," Litvack said.

Litvack said church leaders and Democrats also talked about how presidential candidate Mitt Romney, a Mormon, was being treated in the press and by various groups and individuals as he runs for the Republican Party's nomination. Romney won the Michigan GOP primary last week and hopes to win the Nevada caucuses today.

"We said we understand some of what Romney is seeing, and how his religion is being treated," Litvack said. "And we told (church leaders) this also applies to us — as some Democratic members of the LDS Church are told they can't be good Democrats and good Mormons at the same time." Religious intolerance works both ways, he said.

"As Mitt has been treated unfair, targeted" for being Mormon, so too have some LDS Democratic candidates been targeted in Utah as somehow unworthy of election, he added. "And it is not fair to bring religion into our own campaigns here. I hope people remember this" in Utah local elections later this year.

The church leaders also said they would come out in favor of taking soda-colored, 3.2-percent alcoholic beverages out of grocery stores and putting them into state-operated liquor stores. The church released a statement on that Thursday. Litvack laughed when asked if he thought such alcohol regulations would pass the Legislature, where 80 percent of lawmakers are members of the LDS Church. "Yeah, we'll see on that one."

Clark said church leaders reasoned that any beverage made through distilling liquor should be sold in state liquor stores, distributed by the state to licensed restaurants and private clubs. This new soda-looking 3.2 beverage is distilled, he said. "It is actually a continuation of how we've handled liquor in Utah for some time" — brewed 3.2 percent beverages, such as beer, are sold in grocery stores; wines and distilled liquors, no matter what their alcohol content, are sold in state liquor stores.

Clark, who is sponsoring what's been called a first-step health-care reform bill this session, said church leaders were also interested in that subject. The LDS Church "insures a lot of lives in Utah and elsewhere." Deseret Mutual Benefit Association is the church's main health insurance firm, which also provides insurance for Deseret Morning News employees.

Clark's bill was not public when he met with church officials, so they could not endorse a specific bill, he said. But Clark said they supported his bill's two main concepts — trying to slow down rising health-care costs and beginning to address the needs of 300,000 Utahns who have no health insurance.

Finally, Litvack and Clark said the LDS Church leaders were very concerned about the meth drug crisis in Utah and beyond.

"They are concerned about this problem among their own church members" and how the drug's use is ruining lives and breaking up families, Litvack said.

Clark said the leaders, from the perspective of training their own lay congregation leaders, want to become more involved in seeking solutions to addictive drug problems.

Litvack said he's been active in the past on meth legislation but this year is turning it over to Sen. Chris Buttars, R-West Jordan, and will help from the sidelines.

Litvack expects legislation aimed at helping local county health departments deal with meth-lab houses, where the drug is cooked.

"These cook houses are very expensive to clean up, a real health hazard. There are also the houses where meth is routinely used — not as serious as the cook houses but still a problem," he said.

Posted: January 19th, 2008, 10:40 am
by Stephen
That is great. Talk about timely!