Mitt Romney, Desert Book, the Church, and the Constitution

For discussion of liberty, freedom, government and politics.
User avatar
ithink
captain of 1,000
Posts: 3211
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by ithink »

Stephen wrote:ithink...for the life of me I can't locate that 16pg paper by J. Reuben Clark. The search engine at that site is a monster. It returns thousands of results. Can you or someone else find that paper? I'd love to read it.
It is a monster, I can't find it either, my reference comes from numerous other references from around the web, such as: "On February 15, 1913, J. Reuben Clarke, an attorney employed by the Department of State,
drafted a memorandum to Secretary Knox wherein the following statements were made: "The resolutions passed by twenty-two states contain errors only of capitalization or punctuation, while
those of eleven states contain errors in the wording" (page 7). "Furthermore, under the provisions of the Constitution a legislature is not authorized to alter in any way the amendment proposed by Congress, the function of the legislature consisting merely in the right to approve or disapprove
the proposed amendment." (See Rueben Clarke Memo.) But as you can see, the date of the memo is there if you wish to go get it from them.

Here's a good link though if you wish to read more of a summary about this tax topic:

http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit ... p26pgs.PDF

In court documents, the court states: "The Secretary's decision is
not transparently defective. We need not decide when, if ever, such a decision may be reviewed in order to know that Secretary Knox's decision is now beyond review." Yea, not transparently defective to a law(ia)yer. Any fool can read english, and the fact is it wasn't ratified, and as you can see they finally get around that by saying heck, it's been 70+ years, so it's too late!! This has Gadianton robbers written all over it. You can read it all here: http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/02_laws/motion.pdf

Hope this helps, and if anyone does get a chance to visit the National Archives, pick up a copy pls!

ithink

User avatar
Stephen
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1260
Location: Folsom California
Contact:

Post by Stephen »

Thanks ithink...I'll plow through that info.

User avatar
ithink
captain of 1,000
Posts: 3211
Location: Canada
Contact:

clarke and the 16th amendment

Post by ithink »

No prob Stephen. I originally heard about Clarke being involved somehow in the 16th amendment, and was confused / disappointed that he would be participating in something so devastating to your freedoms. After looking at it closely though, you can see he was very carefully stating -- in a round about sort of way, that the States were not ratifying as they should, but I guess Knox just ignored him and said they were ratified properly anyway. If you get a different angle on it, lemme know.

ithink

User avatar
Stephen
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1260
Location: Folsom California
Contact:

Post by Stephen »

Hey ithink....what is the Canadian perspective of the NAU? Is it publicized out there? Most people here have no idea what you are talking about if you were to mention it.

User avatar
ithink
captain of 1,000
Posts: 3211
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by ithink »

Stephen wrote:Hey ithink....what is the Canadian perspective of the NAU? Is it publicized out there? Most people here have no idea what you are talking about if you were to mention it.
I'm glad you asked. No, it's not publicized any more than in the US. It's pretty easy to set people on fire about it though. I was doing a service call last week, and had mentioned the NAU to an elderly lady. I mentioned the European, Asian, and African Unions, all fait accomplis. I told her the Europeans pay taxes to their Union, and yet the don't elect it's leader. We agreed that Canadians would not put up with this union, but when I told her the globalists wouldn't give up without a fight, she got very serious and said "well if they want a fight -- then bring it on". Picture Clint Eastwood saying "make my day", and you'll have a good idea of what it was like watching this grandmother get all fired up. Many people are like her when they get past the "this can't be real" stage. I guess, well, ever seen a hockey game Canada vs. Russia/US/anyone? We don't really win by finesse, we just pound the other team into submission, with grandmothers leading the way. :shock:

Many people are waking up here. I'm hopeful. I don't know exactly what God is going to use Canada for, but it is separate from the US for a reason (God bless you) and we'll all see why soon (I believe). The US has invaded us 13 times and have failed to conquer every single time. The NAU I would say will make it an even 14, unless they rot us out from within. :o

Proud 2b Peculiar
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5560
Location: American Fork, Utah

Post by Proud 2b Peculiar »

ithink wrote:
Stephen wrote:Hey ithink....what is the Canadian perspective of the NAU? Is it publicized out there? Most people here have no idea what you are talking about if you were to mention it.
I'm glad you asked. No, it's not publicized any more than in the US. It's pretty easy to set people on fire about it though. I was doing a service call last week, and had mentioned the NAU to an elderly lady. I mentioned the European, Asian, and African Unions, all fait accomplis. I told her the Europeans pay taxes to their Union, and yet the don't elect it's leader. We agreed that Canadians would not put up with this union, but when I told her the globalists wouldn't give up without a fight, she got very serious and said "well if they want a fight -- then bring it on". Picture Clint Eastwood saying "make my day", and you'll have a good idea of what it was like watching this grandmother get all fired up. Many people are like her when they get past the "this can't be real" stage. I guess, well, ever seen a hockey game Canada vs. Russia/US/anyone? We don't really win by finesse, we just pound the other team into submission, with grandmothers leading the way. :shock:

Many people are waking up here. I'm hopeful. I don't know exactly what God is going to use Canada for, but it is separate from the US for a reason (God bless you) and we'll all see why soon (I believe). The US has invaded us 13 times and have failed to conquer every single time. The NAU I would say will make it an even 14, unless they rot us out from within. :o
I often wonder if you guys are the boys from the Mountains

Post Reply