What is factually wrong with any part of the following statement (anything that is not opinion or a guess), originally found here?
And I do believe, with my whole heart, that President Thomas S. Monson is the rightful leader and prophet to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, to which the keys to establishing Zion were given and where I believe they still remain, with the First Presidency.Matthew.B wrote:... From the remarks of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young, and how the Church's situation evolved from the time of its establishment to the Manifesto and onwards, it's apparent that the only position the Church could ever openly fight against the Beast and Whore is from within the safety of the political state of Zion, complete with borders and army (as needed).
The Manifesto was the sign that, for whatever reason, the Church was going to submit to Babylon for the time being. Until Zion is established, I doubt that pattern will be changed. Even the Prophet Ezra Taft Benson was quieted before his Presidency because of the necessities of the situation.
For whatever reason, the Church leadership has had to capitulate more and more to Babylon since being inducted into the Union (with the Manifesto being the flagship event there). I doubt that pattern will change until the power of the Gadiantons are broken enough for Zion to have a fighting chance to emerge.
Can anyone else say, "I can't wait for the Cleansing of America"?
