Ron Paul runs - Ron Paul Wins!

[InfoWarrior82]

If anyone promotes or even accepts principles of immorality they are not in tune with Gods law and His spirit and they are practicing a deception. You can not promote immorality on the alter of Gods laws. Therefore one must never use freedom or agency to destroy liberty. This is the flaw in the strict libertarian mindset. If a country accepts principles of wickedness and immorality it will lose its spiritual soul and therefore liberty will be lost.

And you think Ron Paul PROMOTES immorality? Prove it! He’s been married to the same woman for almost half a century. He is a father, a grandfather, a doctor who delivered over 3,000 babies. In all his interactions that I have observed, he has been nothing but a virtuous man, possessed of the spirit of Liberty. So where do you see him promoting wickedness? He promotes the opposite! He promotes virtue!

No politicians today that I can see are advocating a true return to liberty based on its proper definition of a return to Gods law and his word as found in his scriptures. National morality is the only answer to what ails us as a nation and without it we are doomed to failure. That is just the way it is.

No other politician squares more closely with the teachings of the prophets of God than Ron Paul! Have you not heard of Benson Principle? (http://www.ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopi ... 19&t=12347" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) It is a fundamental and true principle of Liberty, as it exists in God himself. Ron Paul is the most perfect embodiment of that eternal principle, more so than any other clown or shill that is running for the presidency now.
Do you think it is MORAL to fight preemptive wars of aggression? Do you think it is MORAL to wiretap and spy on the people? Do you think it is MORAL to torture? Do you think it is MORAL to print money out of thin air and thus plunder the people? Ron Paul is the ONLY one who opposes all these abominations, and not only in word, but in deed, with a 30 year voting record to prove it.

If we are talking about MORALITY, Ron Paul is THE most moral politician that is running for president right now!

And then some.

[LoveIsTruth]

WOW!!!

New Revolution Super PAC Ad: Plastic Men



Wow!

[Original_Intent]

http://www.thestate.com/2011/09/08/1962 ... -jobs.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The War on Jobs
by Ron Paul


With jobs so hard to come by for many Americans, you would think a private company deciding to create more than 1,000 jobs would be cheered by Republicans and Democrats alike.

But President Obama’s National Labor Relations Board is doing everything it can to stop Boeing from opening a new plant in North Charleston.

And as sad as it may seem, at the heart of the board’s actions is political cronyism at its absolute worst.

Since South Carolina is a right-to-work state, workers at Boeing’s new plant can’t be forced under the threat of losing their jobs to hand over a portion of their hard-earned money to union officials in dues.

The labor board’s attempt to force Boeing to stay in a non-right-to-work state where the union bosses can force workers to pay up or be fired is political payback for their undying support during the last presidential campaign.

If the Obama administration succeeds, it could result in the virtual destruction of right-to-work laws all across the country: No longer could private companies decide for themselves where to move or open new facilities; the government would now take on that responsibility and make decisions based solely on what benefits the big-labor elite. Right-to-work states would be left out in the cold.

According to the National Institute for Labor Relations Research, right-to-work states had more than double the job growth of forced-unionism states over the past decade. In other words, big-labor control over American workers is a drag on our economy.

It was organized labor’s stranglehold that drove the big three automakers to the brink of bankruptcy — until American taxpayers were forced to rescue them. And it’s not just in the private sector. Big labor’s control of government workers in California, Illinois and elsewhere has driven those states to the brink of bankruptcy.

Once government union bosses gain “bargaining power” over government workers, the idea of providing taxpayers with the best service at the lowest cost goes out the window. Instead, electing big-government politicians who support skyrocketing salaries, bloated pension packages and other ultra-costly perks becomes priority No. 1.

That’s why I believe the fight against the National Labor Relations Board in South Carolina is so important.

During these tough economic times, throwing our economy under a big labor lock and key would be a tremendous mistake.

Unfortunately, not all of my opponents have a history of always standing up for right to work.

Mitt Romney has come out against a national right-to-work law to end forced union dues nationwide.

Congresswoman Michele Bachmann cosponsored and voted for a big-labor bill to override dozens of state laws and begin forcibly unionizing state and local government workers nationwide.

Gov. Rick Perry signed a bill forcing Texas police and firefighters under union boss control, paving the way for all of Texas’ state and local government employees to be put under organized labor’s thumb.

On the other hand, I have a 100 percent right-to-work voting record.

I’ve never supported forced unionism — and never will. And I’m proud to say I’ve been awarded the prestigious Everett Dirksen award by the National Right to Work Committee.

As a congressman, I’ve been a consistent cosponsor and supporter of national right-to-work legislation. Such a law won’t put more federal code on the books or make government any bigger; in fact, it will help shrink government by repealing forced-dues mandates in federal labor law passed under FDR.

Along with cutting taxes, spending and regulations, passage of right to work would go a long way toward getting our economy moving again.

With so much at stake in this fight, and considering the ever-declining state of our fragile economy, it’s never been more important that the Republican nominee for president be 100 percent committed to standing up for fighting forced unionism.

I assure you that the National Labor Relations Board won’t destroy any right-to-work laws under my watch.

Read more: http://www.thestate.com/2011/09/08/1962 ... z1XlmGbl2S" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[marc]

http://www.breitbart.tv/ron-paul-loudly ... st-attcks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Really "our" fault?

[Zkulptor]

http://www.breitbart.tv/ron-paul-loudly ... st-attcks/

Really "our" fault?

Given they way we treat them...yes...have you seen how we shoot little children and old people in the head, and then say we did not do it? Santorum says " we were not attacked because of our actions" ....riiight!... these people make me sick....

[Mark]

http://www.breitbart.tv/ron-paul-loudly ... st-attcks/

Really "our" fault?

Dr. Paul is both right and wrong on this issue of threats against the homeland and jihadist actions across the globe. Just look at Afganistan for example and somebody tell me please where it is a matter of national defense to continue allowing our soldiers to be shot at and killed in this third world country. For what? Defending the Afgans against the taliban? Is that our role in the world to become the international police force? Its absolutely ridiculous and Dr. Paul is one of the only politicians who understands that ludicricy and has the courage to say something about this wicked joke of a foreign policy.

However having said that jihadists and terrorists are not killing innocents around the world because they want to defend their lands against occupation. They are killing innocent people in multitudes of countries around the globe because they are religious zealots who use their religion to justify murder and mahem globally. 12th Imam anyone? Sharia law?? They are looking to control the souls of man just like many wicked combinations in the west are doing. There are no good guys with those following Satans methods of control.

These murderers do not care spit about defense of country or family. They are inspired by Satan to murder and plunder just as many gadianton robbers in the Book of Mormon were likewise inspired to do so. They worship a false God who tells them to kill innocent people. Its as simple as that.

[LoveIsTruth]

http://www.breitbart.tv/ron-paul-loudly ... st-attcks/

Really "our" fault?

Dr. Paul is both right and wrong on this issue of threats against the homeland and jihadist actions across the globe. Just look at Afganistan for example and somebody tell me please where it is a matter of national defense to continue allowing our soldiers to be shot at and killed in this third world country. For what? Defending the Afgans against the taliban? Is that our role in the world to become the international police force? Its absolutely ridiculous and Dr. Paul is one of the only politicians who understands that ludicricy and has the courage to say something about this wicked joke of a foreign policy.

However having said that jihadists and terrorists are not killing innocents around the world because they want to defend their lands against occupation. They are killing innocent people in multitudes of countries around the globe because they are religious zealots who use their religion to justify murder and mahem globally. 12th Imam anyone? Sharia law?? They are looking to control the souls of man just like many wicked combinations in the west are doing. There are no good guys with those following Satans methods of control.

These murderers do not care spit about defense of country or family. They are inspired by Satan to murder and plunder just as many gadianton robbers in the Book of Mormon were likewise inspired to do so. They worship a false God who tells them to kill innocent people. Its as simple as that.

Here it is that the fraud of 9-11 comes into picture again. Muslims did not commit terror in this country. Our government did. There is too much evidence to dispute that. None of the attacks where Muslims were involved could have happened without FBI or some other agency supplying explosives, visas, passports, money vehicles etc. This was the case with the "shoe" bomber, "underwear" bomber, WTC first bombing, etc, etc, for more see:
http://www.ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopi ... =1&t=15197" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

But what Dr. Paul is saying, if they come here and commit crimes, then prosecute them. But we are not justified in waging preemptive wars of aggression.

[Like]

[LoveIsTruth]

FOX: Ron Paul Can Win

[InfoWarrior82]

However having said that jihadists and terrorists are not killing innocents around the world because they want to defend their lands against occupation. They are killing innocent people in multitudes of countries around the globe because they are religious zealots who use their religion to justify murder and mahem globally. 12th Imam anyone? Sharia law?? They are looking to control the souls of man just like many wicked combinations in the west are doing. There are no good guys with those following Satans methods of control.

These murderers do not care spit about defense of country or family. They are inspired by Satan to murder and plunder just as many gadianton robbers in the Book of Mormon were likewise inspired to do so. They worship a false God who tells them to kill innocent people. Its as simple as that.

The leaders that inspire these religious fanatics in the middle east are doing so to push politics. Like you said, using religion to justify murder... to a political end. They need a boogeyman just like Americans need a boogeyman. Who else better to use as a boogeyman than arrogant, imperialistic, warmongering nations such as the United States, Britain, etc. ??? If it wasn't us, they'd use other countries who would fill that profile.

My point is, at the heart of it all, you'll find that it's all politically motivated. All the real terrorism that you see (about as rare as an endangered species) is being driven by the "evil oppressors" because of their overbearing presence in the region. THEN comes the propaganda about us being "heathens" who need to be wiped out. It comes in that order. Not the other way around. Ron Paul understands this! Glenn Beck does not. By reversing our current foreign policy (not meddling around in their affairs), we cut out the original reason to use our country as a boogeyman in the first place.

Of course, this is all 9/11 truth aside.

[LoveIsTruth]

Ron Paul Rocks the Debate!!!
Ron Paul Highlights - CNN Tea Party Debate

[moonwhim]

A Chronicle of Dirty Tricks Against Ron Paul

The establishment is terrified that the liberty-driven Congressman has entered the 'top tier'

By Paul Joseph Watson

Now that the establishment media has been forced to concede that Ron Paul is a top tier candidate for the Republican nomination, having initially tried to ignore his campaign altogether, expect the smears, dirty tricks and hit pieces against the Texan Congressman to intensify.

In this article, we're going to take a brief look at some of the attacks on Ron Paul that we have documented over the last several years.

The most recent example occurred earlier this week. The corporate press attempted to portray Ron Paul as anti-American simply for pointing out the fact that having military bases and occupying armies in foreign countries increases the risk of terrorist attacks. Despite the smear, reality shows that Ron Paul has received more money in donations from active duty military personnel than all of the other Republican candidates combined and more than Barack Obama himself, and his views on foreign occupations are supported by the very U.S. troops that neo-cons constantly invoke to support maintaining such foreign occupations.
Even as Ron Paul won every debate poll and performed well in national polls, the mainstream media admitted that there was a deliberate talking point to exclude his campaign from discussion. After pointing out that Ron Paul only lost to Michele Bachmann by a tiny percentage (and that after accusations that Bachmann's campaign attempted to rig the result by buying 4,000 votes), and that the Ames result was virtually a "tie for first," Politico's Roger Simon said the reason for him being ignored was that "the media doesn't believe he has a hoot in hells chance of winning the Iowa caucuses, the Republican nomination or winning the presidency, so we're gonna ignore him." CNN host Howard Kurtz even admitted that, "We are in the business of kicking candidates out of the race".

In February, Fox News claimed that a technical error was responsible for them playing old footage which contained audio of booing as Ron Paul was announced as the winner of the 2011 CPAC poll. In a shocking act of mass public deception, Fox News attempted to skew Ron Paul's 2011 CPAC straw poll win by representing it with footage from the previous year's CPAC event, at which Mitt Romney supporters had loudly booed the result and Paul supporters had been absent due to a Campaign for Liberty meeting running late
Indeed, Fox News has a history of smearing and sidelining Ron Paul, but this editorial policy is routinely passed off as a "mistake" of one kind or another.

Was it another "mistake" to omit Paul's name entirely from a Fox News survey that asked who would make the best president? Was it a "mistake" that relative nobodies like John Thune and Jon Huntsman were included in the Fox poll and yet Paul was blacklisted entirely despite his CPAC success two years running?

Was it another "mistake" on behalf of Fox News to exclude Paul from a January 6 2008 presidential forum event because they saw the prospect of anti-war opinions being voiced by the most conservative member of the House as a "threat"?

Was it a "mistake" for Fox News to claim that their own May 2007 presidential poll, which Ron Paul won, was unreliable, because online Paul supporters had skewed the result, despite the fact that the survey was conducted via cell phone text messaging and no online votes were taken?

Was it a mere "mistake" for Fox News host Sean Hannity to deride the Texas Congressman's runaway success in the text messaging poll as nothing more than "Paulites" flood voting, when in reality only one vote per cell phone number was allowed? Hannity's contention that Ron Paul supporters were simply dialing in over and over again was nothing more than a brazen lie intended to dismiss the Congressman's widespread popularity. No one at Fox News bothered to correct Hannity and no retraction was issued.

Was it another "mistake" when Fox News started editing Ron Paul's name out of Associated Press stories they syndicated before the 2008 presidential campaign?

Was it a "mistake" for Fox News to denigrate the fact that Ron Paul received the most campaign donations from members of the U.S. military by attributing it to "libertarian mailing lists"?

Was it a "mistake" when Fox News attempted to smear Ron Paul for having the audacity to appear on the Alex Jones Show and the nerve to merely converse with people who commit the thought crime of not completely trusting the official government version of 9/11?

Was it a "mistake" when Fox News rigged the structure of their entire May 2007 presidential debate and used it as a vehicle for all the other candidates to viciously attack Ron Paul, while Fox's pre-screened audience rapaciously applauded calls for torture and warmongering?

Was it a "mistake" when Fox News directors conspired to censor Ron Paul supporters from appearing in camera shots during the Mackinac Republican Conference on September 22, 2007, when they were caught on film stating, "I don't want these Ron Paul people, but I need shots of audience"?

Was it a "mistake" for Fox News to ignore a story every other news outlet was obliged to report, the record-breaking $4.2 million in campaign donations that Ron Paul achieved in a single day, while instead choosing to obsess about a man in Texas who sat in a bath tub full of snakes?

However, smear attacks against Ron Paul have come from both the phony right and the phony left.

In 2007, neo-con blowhard Glenn Beck, then a host with CNN, smeared Ron Paul supporters as terrorists, calling them a "physical threat" who should be dealt with by the U.S. military because they are causing Americans to be disenfranchised with the government.

MSNBC has also routinely attacked Ron Paul as well as his son, Senator Rand Paul. The network consistently shunned the Congressman during the 2008 debates, giving him less than half the time received by the other candidates. MSNBC also ignored Ron Paul's debate victory last week in its own poll, while inaccurately depicting the margin of his victory over the other candidates.

This list of smear attacks is likely to grow much larger the nearer we get to the Republican nomination in 2012. However, now that the establishment is so discredited, their dirty tricks against Paul are having less and less impact, while the Congressman's national polling figures continue to improve week by week.

[Like]

here is another fan:



http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/15/barry ... %E2%80%99/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[LoveIsTruth]

[InfoWarrior82]

Ron Paul wins GOP California straw poll
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44565575/ns ... nYlztSfUaA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

GOP presidential hopeful Ron Paul wins California straw poll
http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/09/17/ ... =allsearch" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Ron Paul Wins California GOP Straw Poll
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/09 ... traw-poll/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[InfoWarrior82]

)

http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-cheate ... -poll-win/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Ron Paul Cheated Out of Texas Straw Poll Win?

Congressman would have defeated Governor Perry in his own state

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, September 19, 2011

Ron Paul is riding high again after his California Straw Poll victory yesterday, but some Paul supporters are questioning why the Texas Straw Poll was cancelled for “lack of interest,” and whether it was actually killed because the Congressman would have inflicted an embarrassing defeat on Governor Rick Perry in his own state.



According to a June 16 Washington Times report, the Texas GOP decided to cancel the straw poll because of a “lack of interest expressed by the candidates,” and due to fears that the event would not recoup the financial outlay needed to stage it.

The claim that the poll was cancelled due to “lack of interest” doesn’t correlate with the firestorm of media attention generated by Rick Perry’s announcement of his candidacy, as well as the building momentum of the Paul campaign, which went supernova after the media hoax of attempting to pretend the Congressman doesn’t exist spectacularly imploded last month.

There seems little doubt that Ron Paul would have defeated Rick Perry in the Texas Straw Poll, sending out the embarrassing message that those who know Perry’s record best, lone star state voters, have no trust in his leadership. This would have been a massive blow to the perception of Perry’s electability nationwide.

A presidential survey of voters in both candidate’s home state conducted by the Azimuth Research Group last month found that Texans would be more likely to vote for Congressman Paul over Governor Perry by a margin of 22% to 17%.

Indeed, Paul has made it a focus of his campaign, including an expensive TV commercial, to bring attention to what the Perry campaign fears the most, his outing as a globalist RINO (Republican In Name Only).

A Texas Straw Poll win for Paul would have thrown fresh spotlight on Perry’s history as a campaign manager for Al Gore, and his legacy of big government policies such as his support for the Trans Texas Corridor, toll roads owned by foreign companies, and his 1993 advocacy of Hillarycare.

It would not be the first time a straw poll was cancelled by establishment Republicans in order to neutralize a winning platform for Ron Paul’s campaign. The 2007 San Francisco straw poll was cancelled due to there being “too many Ron Paul supporters”. The Colorado straw poll was also cancelled that year, with the Adams County GOP citing the exact same reason.

The establishment media has openly attempted to unfairly marginalize Ron Paul’s campaign this year. Following a September 12 Republican debate in Cincinnati, a straw poll found Ron Paul to be the winner. However, CNN refused to release the results of the poll and instead published an online poll, omitting Ron Paul from the list of candidates.

[LoveIsTruth]

Ron Paul DOUBLES His National Support In Just 2 Weeks
​
Ron Paul is now a confirmed presidential frontrunner for 2012!


http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-double ... t-2-weeks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[LoveIsTruth]

Ron Paul: The Only One (now running) We Can Trust
Amazing!

[alexoyarzun]

You can sense the energy as Ron Paul in walking through the building:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYMx6SjN ... r_embedded" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[LoveIsTruth]

You can sense the energy as Ron Paul in walking through the building:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYMx6SjN ... r_embedded" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Thanks! Here it is

[LoveIsTruth]

Ron Paul Ad - He Served

[LoveIsTruth]

Ron Paul: Obama cuts to veterans' health benefits 'unjust and immoral'

http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/po ... ealth-care" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[LoveIsTruth]

Ron Paul on WHO’s Jan Mickelson Show (9/20/2011)

Talks about income tax & 16th amendment fraud!

[marc]

Paul is winning in the poll on this page (About half way down on the right side).

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/americas- ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[InfoWarrior82]

Paul is winning in the poll on this page (About half way down on the right side).

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/americas- ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Yup! STILLLL leading in last night's debate. Anyone here think he won't win another poll? )