Page 1 of 1

Obama suggests that he may arm Libya rebels

Posted: March 29th, 2011, 7:03 pm
by Songbird
What is this guy trying to do??? @-) Get us bombed??? :-o Does anyone know the scripture, (I think it is a scripture) where it says something to the effect of we won't be able to defend ourselves as a nation because we are spread too thin?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12902450
Obama not ruling out Libya arms
US President Barack Obama has said he does not rule out arming the rebels seeking to overthrow Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.
He said in an interview that Col Gaddafi had been greatly weakened and would ultimately step down.
Pro-Gaddafi forces have driven the rebels back tens of kilometres over ground they took in recent days after coalition air strikes.
The rebels have now retreated eastwards past the town of Ras Lanuf.
News of the rebel withdrawal came as an international conference on Libya in London agreed to set up a contact group involving Arab governments to co-ordinate help for a post-Gaddafi Libya.
At least several thousand people have been killed and thousands wounded since the uprising against Col Gaddafi's rule began more than six weeks ago, with the rebels now controlling much of the east and pro-Gaddafi forces holding the capital Tripoli and other western cities.
'All options'
Asked by US media if he supported arming the rebels, President Obama said: "I'm not ruling it out but I'm also not ruling it in."
He confirmed America would supply assistance to opponents of Col Gaddafi in the form of humanitarian aid, medical supplies and communications equipment.
Mr Obama emphasised that the Libyan campaign did not foreshadow military action in Syria or other countries where protests have been violently put down.
He said Libya presented a "unique circumstance" in which a coalition had come together under a UN mandate to "save a lot of lives", and he added that America's military was already overstretched.
French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe said at the London conference that France and its partners were prepared to discuss arming the rebels but not without the backing of a new UN Security Council resolution.
"I remind you that this is not what is envisaged by Resolution 1973... so for the moment France has agreed to the strict application of these resolutions," he said.
However, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the conference that although UN sanctions prohibited the delivery of arms to Libya, the ban no longer applied.
"It is our interpretation that [UN Security Council resolution] 1973 amended or overrode the absolute prohibition on arms to anyone in Libya," she said.
UK Foreign Secretary William Hague told the BBC that Britain was not planning to give military assistance to rebels "in any form... at the moment".
"Our focus is on trying to protect those civilian areas with the measures that we've been carrying out the last ten days," he added.
Rebel retreat
Forces loyal to Col Gaddafi launched a new offensive on Monday, consolidating their hold on western Libya.
Hundreds of rebels fled in panic from the recently captured town of Bin Jawad and there were also reports of further shelling in the city of Misrata, which government forces are battling to seize back.
The BBC's Nick Springate reports from eastern Libya that the country has seen an incredible reverse for the rebels.
Their retreat is very significant as it shows they have lost the momentum gained after coalition attacks which allowed them to take the towns of Ajdabiya, Brega and Ras Lanuf, our correspondent says.
It also shows the rebels lack supply lines and organisation, he adds.
In the capital, Tripoli, several large explosions were heard close to the Libyan leader's residence.
A senior official close to Col Gaddafi told the BBC that he believed the Libyan government could accept the partition of the country and the division of its oil revenues.

Re: Obama suggests that he may arm Libya rebels

Posted: March 29th, 2011, 7:09 pm
by Rincon
Removed

Re: Obama suggests that he may arm Libya rebels

Posted: March 29th, 2011, 7:16 pm
by InfoWarrior82
Rincon wrote:I wish some of you well educated people would help me understand why the NWO insiders want the Rebels to succeed. I already know everything Barry Soetoro does is to please the insiders. I just don't understand how this agenda fits with the NWO.

Depends on who you listen to. If you listen to Lindsey Williams, this whole Middle East thing is merely a distraction while the hand you should be looking at is Russia & China.

Some say that Gaddafi was going to nationalize Libya's oil. http://www.infowars.com/in-2009-gaddafi ... ibyas-oil/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Some say that Gaddafi wasn't playing by the rules anymore and they need a more loyal puppet.

http://www.infowars.com/alex-jones-al-q ... ed-by-cia/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Obama suggests that he may arm Libya rebels

Posted: March 29th, 2011, 7:18 pm
by Original_Intent
Rincon wrote:I wish some of you well educated people would help me understand why the NWO insiders want the Rebels to succeed. I already know everything Barry Soetoro does is to please the insiders. I just don't understand how this agenda fits with the NWO.
The U.S. is the world's only superpower.
We need to financially and militarily be brought down to parity or close to it, so that when we are attacked by one or multiple nations, it will be a close enough match that we can nearly obliterate each other. We will do like we always do in war time and borrow to the hilt (OK we are already to the hilt, what comes after that?) the other side does the same, the NWO finances both sides, just like always (but is sure to have no real skin in the game) The side that wins has to pay their debt off, the losing side has to give up mineral rights. taxation for a bazillion years (with no benefits for the citizens, it is just to retire the debt) in other words both sides are effectively enslaved to the money counterfeiters.

Right now if someone REALLY tried to threaten the U.S. (like with imminent destruction) we still have the power that we could and would flatten anyone. So all the ME wars are just to bleed us financially, get us so war-weary that we lack the will to fight even in a legitimate war, etc. That's my take on it. NWO is NOT based in the U.S. a lot of people think a strong U.S. is in the NWO plans - I don't think so!

Re: Obama suggests that he may arm Libya rebels

Posted: March 29th, 2011, 7:29 pm
by Rincon
Removed

Re: Obama suggests that he may arm Libya rebels

Posted: March 30th, 2011, 2:30 pm
by Fiannan
Isn't the USA already giving Al Quaida ample air support to fight the Libyan government?

Re: Obama suggests that he may arm Libya rebels

Posted: March 30th, 2011, 2:36 pm
by Col. Flagg
Fiannan wrote:Isn't the USA already giving Al Quaida ample air support to fight the Libyan government?
You mean 'al CIA-da'? Same organization.

Re: Obama suggests that he may arm Libya rebels

Posted: March 30th, 2011, 11:23 pm
by kathyn
Original Intent, I think the NWO needs the US to be destroyed. That's the way I see it.

Re: Obama suggests that he may arm Libya rebels

Posted: March 31st, 2011, 4:44 pm
by InfoWarrior82

Re: Obama suggests that he may arm Libya rebels

Posted: March 31st, 2011, 5:18 pm
by Original_Intent
kathyn wrote:Original Intent, I think the NWO needs the US to be destroyed. That's the way I see it.
My very truly worst fear about the whole NWO thing is I think many, including members, would not mind a NWO as long is it is OUR country that is the head of it. No one says it in so many words but I see many MANY who clearly indicate that is their feeling. I've seen people on this board HINT that the NWO might not be a bad thing since Christ will rule the world (as if He needs the NWO to set up the infrastructure!)

The Kingdom will be built on Babylon's ashes, not by takeover. (IMHO)

Re: Obama suggests that he may arm Libya rebels

Posted: March 31st, 2011, 9:52 pm
by Silas
I would be surprised if we aren't already arming them. They are getting weapons from somewhere and I am sure the CIA is already on the ground. I guess Obama has to make it look like it is a tuff choice he is wrestling with so the public can think that he really feels this is the best thing to do. I don't know.