LDS Freedom Forum

HAARP Magnetometer data shows Japan earthquake was induced.

Click on the above link for full details.

.... Scientific proof that solar flares didn’t cause Japan earthquake.

.... are destroying World food production, not solar flares or global warming.

OK, so here's my question about HAARP - if it's located in Alaska, how are they going to be able to focus its energy on the plate tectonics surroudning Japan some 5,000+ miles away? This is the only question I've never seen answered about it - being able to focus its energy in or on a specific region.

Kiaora Col Flagg,

They have a sea going vessel, details & pics of it are in the above links I posted.

Kind regards

LDSNZ wrote:Kiaora Col Flagg,

They have a sea going vessel, details & pics of it are in the above links I posted.

Kind regards

Do we know its location at the time of the earthquake?

Col,

If you read the linked info, you'll answer all your own questions. Thankyou.

Kind regards

Thank you for the post! I've felt it to be true.
I'm reminded of what President Benson stated:

In Matthew, chapter 24, we learn of 'famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes...'(Matt.24:7.) The Lord declared that these and other calamities shall occur. These particular prophecies seem not to be conditional. The Lord, with his foreknowledge, knows that they will happen. Some will come about through man's manipulations; others through the forces of nature and nature's God, but that they will come seems certain. Prophecy is but history in reverse--a divine disclosure of the future events. (In Conference Report, Oct. 1973,p. 89; or Ensign,Jan.1974,p.68)

this stuff is major LOLZ lol love it.

cHaddock wrote:In Matthew, chapter 24, we learn of 'famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes...'(Matt.24:7.) The Lord declared that these and other calamities shall occur. These particular prophecies seem not to be conditional. The Lord, with his foreknowledge, knows that they will happen. Some will come about through man's manipulations; others through the forces of nature and nature's God, but that they will come seems certain. Prophecy is but history in reverse--a divine disclosure of the future events. (In Conference Report, Oct. 1973,p. 89; or Ensign,Jan.1974,p.68)

Great quote from Pres Benson: "Thankyou for posting it, till now was unaware of it".

I'm reminded of what President Benson stated:
In Matthew, chapter 24, we learn of 'famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes...'(Matt.24:7.) The Lord declared that these and other calamities shall occur. These particular prophecies seem not to be conditional. The Lord, with his foreknowledge, knows that they will happen. Some will come about through man's manipulations; others through the forces of nature and nature's God, but that they will come seems certain. Prophecy is but history in reverse--a divine disclosure of the future events. (In Conference Report, Oct. 1973,p. 89; or Ensign,Jan.1974,p.68)

John Locke wrote:this stuff is major LOLZ lol love it.

Which part of president bensons quote are you laughing at, or was it something else you thought was LOLZ?

John Locke wrote:this stuff is major LOLZ lol love it.

You are so hip John Locke. I'm laughing right there with you.

cHaddock wrote:Thank you for the post! I've felt it to be true.
I'm reminded of what President Benson stated:

In Matthew, chapter 24, we learn of 'famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes...'(Matt.24:7.) The Lord declared that these and other calamities shall occur. These particular prophecies seem not to be conditional. The Lord, with his foreknowledge, knows that they will happen. Some will come about through man's manipulations; others through the forces of nature and nature's God, but that they will come seems certain. Prophecy is but history in reverse--a divine disclosure of the future events. (In Conference Report, Oct. 1973,p. 89; or Ensign,Jan.1974,p.68)

Dont forget that president Hinckley stated that Hurricane Katrina wasn't the the Lords punishment on the people of New Orleans,indicating to me that the disaster was manmade.

p51-mustang wrote:

cHaddock wrote:Thank you for the post! I've felt it to be true.
I'm reminded of what President Benson stated:

In Matthew, chapter 24, we learn of 'famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes...'(Matt.24:7.) The Lord declared that these and other calamities shall occur. These particular prophecies seem not to be conditional. The Lord, with his foreknowledge, knows that they will happen. Some will come about through man's manipulations; others through the forces of nature and nature's God, but that they will come seems certain. Prophecy is but history in reverse--a divine disclosure of the future events. (In Conference Report, Oct. 1973,p. 89; or Ensign,Jan.1974,p.68)

Dont forget that president Hinckley stated that Hurricane Katrina wasn't the the Lords punishment on the people of New Orleans,indicating to me that the disaster was manmade.

The forces of nature are not limited to either punishments from God or something that man may have unleashed because of modern technology. They are just a normal part of the workings of the planets. It isn't an either/or proposition.

Don't forget that president Hinckley stated that Hurricane Katrina wasn't the the Lords punishment on the people of New Orleans,indicating to me that the disaster was man-made.

Or simply that The Lord had not chosen to single out New Orleans for destruction - as of yet.

Mark wrote:The forces of nature are not limited to either punishments from God or something that man may have unleashed because of modern technology. They are just a normal part of the workings of the planets. It isn't an either/or proposition.

I agree with this - just because there's a major natural disaster somewhere on the planet doesn't necessarily mean the Lord's hand was involved - there is a natural cycle to a lot of earth changes and EQ's are one of them.

In his 1970 book Between Two Ages, Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, described that not only was a completely new arsenal of weapons under development, but the concepts of strategy were transforming.
He says these new weapons included weather attacks, autonomous warships, chemical and biological weapons, and death rays. According to Brzezinski, this technology could be used for conducting “secret warfare” by a small number of security forces.

This new war is basically characterized by small-scale conflicts waged by small units with advanced weapons. Some of this technology, including directed-energy weapons, may be used by the US for assassinations under conditions which offer plausible deniability.

Similarly, in its 1995 report, Non-Lethal Technologies: Military Options and Implications, the Council on Foreign Relations suggested that in a covert war against the global enemy that secrecy must be used to preserve the effectiveness of these new weapons and to create confusion as to the source of the attacks.

In his 1970 book Between Two Ages, Zbigniew Brzezinski, cofounder of the Trilateral Commission, advocated the covert use of weather attacks, such as long periods of drought or storm, to force a nation into compliance.

"Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces will be appraised... Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm or to produce earthquakes"

Are we still laughing now that we know they broke Nicola Tesla's code in electromagnatism? :-s

Mark wrote:The forces of nature are not limited to either punishments from God or something that man may have unleashed because of modern technology. They are just a normal part of the workings of the planets. It isn't an either/or proposition.

Care to provide proof???? Scripture, science.....anything really! I happen to know of a couple of volcanoes unleashed by man....

The Book of Revelation tells us that God will destroy those that "destroy the earth". Gee, I didn't know men had the capability of destroying the earth until Zbigniew Brzezinski mentioned it.

"And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth." (Rev.11:18)

Just because it was HAARP caused doesn't mean it was our HAARP. Other ionospheric heaters exist around the planet -- including one in Japan run by the same doomsday cult that released Sarin nerve gas in the Tokyo subway.

Randy in Gunnison

Squally wrote:

I'm reminded of what President Benson stated:
In Matthew, chapter 24, we learn of 'famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes...'(Matt.24:7.) The Lord declared that these and other calamities shall occur. These particular prophecies seem not to be conditional. The Lord, with his foreknowledge, knows that they will happen. Some will come about through man's manipulations; others through the forces of nature and nature's God, but that they will come seems certain. Prophecy is but history in reverse--a divine disclosure of the future events. (In Conference Report, Oct. 1973,p. 89; or Ensign,Jan.1974,p.68)

John Locke wrote:this stuff is major LOLZ lol love it.

Which part of president bensons quote are you laughing at, or was it something else you thought was LOLZ?

the part where otherwise intelligent people think the quake in Japan was "induced" by man...talk about giving man WAY too much credit. So again make fun of me cause I don't conform to your ridiculous notions, but I stand by my statement that this thread is serious LOLZ...and yes I am hip :YMSMUG: B-)

Jason wrote:

Mark wrote:The forces of nature are not limited to either punishments from God or something that man may have unleashed because of modern technology. They are just a normal part of the workings of the planets. It isn't an either/or proposition.

Care to provide proof???? Scripture, science.....anything really! I happen to know of a couple of volcanoes unleashed by man....

:ymsigh: Mark posted that the forces of nature are not limited to either God's punishments or modern technology. He said it isn't an either/or proposition. Isn't that just common sense?? The opposite (what it appears you're saying) would be that every force of nature is either a punishment from God or a man made event and nothing else. Mark is correct on this one. But hey, if I hear in general conference that God created this earth to punish man OR that man created this earth I might rethink my position )

shadow wrote:

Jason wrote:

Mark wrote:The forces of nature are not limited to either punishments from God or something that man may have unleashed because of modern technology. They are just a normal part of the workings of the planets. It isn't an either/or proposition.

Care to provide proof???? Scripture, science.....anything really! I happen to know of a couple of volcanoes unleashed by man....

:ymsigh: Mark posted that the forces of nature are not limited to either God's punishments or modern technology. He said it isn't an either/or proposition. Isn't that just common sense?? The opposite (what it appears you're saying) would be that every force of nature is either a punishment from God or a man made event and nothing else. Mark is correct on this one. But hey, if I hear in general conference that God created this earth to punish man OR that man created this earth I might rethink my position )

How does "normal workings of the planets" differ from "acts of God"?

Jason wrote:How does "normal workings of the planets" differ from "acts of God"?

They don't differ, but that's not what Mark said.
Are all "acts of of God" "punishments from God"? Nope! Thus the forces of nature are NOT limited to either punishments from God or something man may have unleashed. It's not an either/or proposition.