LDS Freedom Forum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIbuRMVVekg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Anyone ever wonder why the population has fallen the way it has in almost every single developed nation? One would think that there would be more demographic diversity than there is, but hey, maybe it is just a coincidence, right?

The Spirit World is a place to rest from our troubles and cares. So be it.

The Spirit World is a place to rest from our troubles and cares. So be it.

The Mortal World is the place to WORK in defense of Christ's Eternal Laws of Liberty and Justice.

Maybe this is why Harry Reid has gone after the polygamists so much -- not so much how they live (come on, Vegas is no virtuous city) but because they reproduce at higher levels than any other group in the USA.

Now think about it, if we KNOW that the US government/NWO is anti-natalist, and it isn't just a few eco-hippies calling for reduced birth rates, then shouldn't that actually tell us whose side we are on if we tell our children and grand children that having a large family is not necessarily the ideal? Maybe if people realize this is not a coincidence of modern culture, the idea that having kids is sooooo 19th. Century, then within our own families we can have the blessings of Abraham realized. If other members of the Church, no matter how high of positions they have, lose sight of this then so what? It will be their families that will fizzle out and disappear (genetically and culturally) in the not-so-distant future.

In-depth explanation of eugenics beginning at the 1 hour 30 min mark:

Mr. Jones only does one flaw with his video -- he lumps positive and negative eugenics together. Teddy Roosevelt and Brigham Young supported the more positive side of eugenics (people with good health, morals and intelligence should have more babies to improve the health of the gene pool and society in general) while people like Sanger and Hitler wanted to eliminate people and leave only people with certain traits to continue the species. The problem today is that the NWO wants a reduction in population -- I suspect they want to wait until the population is far less than today and then start the program of positive eugenics. The ultimate irony though is that today the people who are ambitious, or the ones truly concerned for the planet, are the ones who are not having kids while the people on welfare are far more likely to have large families.

Fiannan wrote:Mr. Jones only does one flaw with his video -- he lumps positive and negative eugenics together. Teddy Roosevelt and Brigham Young supported the more positive side of eugenics (people with good health, morals and intelligence should have more babies to improve the health of the gene pool and society in general) while people like Sanger and Hitler wanted to eliminate people and leave only people with certain traits to continue the species. The problem today is that the NWO wants a reduction in population -- I suspect they want to wait until the population is far less than today and then start the program of positive eugenics. The ultimate irony though is that today the people who are ambitious, or the ones truly concerned for the planet, are the ones who are not having kids while the people on welfare are far more likely to have large families.

The welfare state encourages people who are feckless and lazy to have dozens of children, while those of us who work to pay taxes can't afford to have any. That's another form of eugenics. The UK has plenty of large families where there is no one working. They spend their time playing the lottery and drooling at the TV. Those of us with PhDs and who work for a living will leave nothing for the future.

Well Englsih Saint then if you don't want the future of your country to look like an episode of "Little Britain" then maybe those with PhDs should consider having a few more kids. Come on, you live in a socialist country -- it is easier for a couple in Britain to have four kids than it is in the USA. Yet many devout LDS people have 6 or 8 kids. Depends on what the priorities are.

Oh, and I have read that many career women prefer to go to sperm banks in Britain than to marry a British man -- many choose to take a little vacation to Denmark for some Viking genes and escape the control of NHS bureaucratic red tape of going for insemination in Britain. Yet what is up with single women and lesbians wanting kids? You guys need to legalize polygamy or something?

Oh wait, once Britain is majority Islamic polygamy will probably become legal.