Page 2 of 3
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 3:51 pm
by patriotsaint
BG,
I think this interpretation on personal revelation is taken a bit too far. If personal revelation were the exclusive vehicle we should use when attempting to learn any gospel principle, then why would the Lord say , "And I give unto you a commandment that you shall teach one another the doctrine of the kingdom"?(D&C 88:77) Why would we have general conference, sunday school, and any other form of teaching if we were simply meant to receive personal revelation exclusively?
Now of course each teaching must be confirmed by the Spirit which is why the Lord clarifies the statement above by saying, "if ye receive not the Spirit ye shall not teach". (D&C 42:14)
If we feel the spirit prompt us to teach, we should teach. If the spirit directs us not to share an insight, we should keep quiet. We find this happening in the case of Nephi when he is instructed to stop recording his vision in 1Nephi 14. In verse 28 he says, "And behold, I, Nephi, am forbidden that I should write the remainder of the things which I saw and heard; wherefore the things which I have written sufficeth me; and I have written but a small part of the things which I saw".
Just because there are times when we should keep quiet doesn't mean that there aren't instances when we should absolutely share something we have learned. That is why it is important to foster a closeness with the Spirit so we will know when to share, and when to keep quiet.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 3:58 pm
by teejayroy
Elias Returns wrote:I am an ordinance worker in the Boise Idaho Temple, and there are......I repeat, there are only certain places, that certain ordinances should be discussed, and that is not to be the outside of His Holy House in Babylon. We make covenants to this degree, and those that break those covenants I pray that the Lord has mercy upon their souls. There is a reason why we can discuss the Baptismal Ordinance performed there, because if you notice it is conducted and performed at the lowest level in the Temple itself. This is symbolic.

Totally agree!! Although there are sites out there that does mention things that go on inside the Temples,we as Latter-day saints need to be careful what we say.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 4:26 pm
by buffalo_girl
I think this interpretation on personal revelation is taken a bit too far. If personal revelation were the exclusive vehicle we should use when attempting to learn any gospel principle, then why would the Lord say , "And I give unto you a commandment that you shall teach one another the doctrine of the kingdom"?(D&C 88:77) Why would we have general conference, sunday school, and any other form of teaching if we were simply meant to receive personal revelation exclusively?
I'm not saying we can't or shouldn't teach one another. I'm saying that imposing on another person - one's own spiritual insights given in or about the temple - 'corrupts' that other person's opportunity to receive pure insight for him or herself in the temple.
I'm not sure where you got the notion that I receive personal revelation without study, prayer, and gospel discussion.
Doctrine & Covenants 42
12 And again, the elders, priests and teachers of this church shall teach the principles of my gospel, which are in the Bible and the Book of Mormon, in the which is the fulness of the gospel.
13 And they shall observe the covenants and church articles to do them, and these shall be their teachings, as they shall be directed by the Spirit.
14 And the Spirit shall be given unto you by the prayer of faith; and if ye receive not the Spirit ye shall not teach.
15 And all this ye shall observe to do as I have commanded concerning your teaching, until the fulness of my scriptures is given.
Doctrine & Covenants 50
10 And now come, saith the Lord, by the Spirit, unto the elders of his church, and let us reason together, that ye may understand;
11 Let us reason even as a man reasoneth one with another face to face.
12 Now, when a man reasoneth he is understood of man, because he reasoneth as a man; even so will I, the Lord, reason with you that you may understand.
13 Wherefore, I the Lord ask you this question—unto what were ye ordained?
14 To preach my gospel by the Spirit, even the Comforter which was sent forth to teach the truth.
2 Nephi 28
30 For behold, thus saith the Lord God: I will give unto the children of men line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little and there a little; and blessed are those who hearken unto my precepts, and lend an ear unto my counsel, for they shall learn wisdom; for unto him that receiveth I will give more; and from them that shall say, We have enough, from them shall be taken away even that which they have.
31 Cursed is he that putteth his trust in man, or maketh flesh his arm, or shall hearken unto the precepts of men, save their precepts shall be given by the power of the Holy Ghost.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 4:31 pm
by oneClimbs
buffalo_girl wrote:I'm not saying we can't or shouldn't teach one another. I'm saying that imposing on another person - one's own spiritual insights given in or about the temple - 'corrupts' that other person's opportunity to receive pure insight for him or herself in the temple.
Who is imposing spiritual insights on people around here?
I think the only thing that corrupts a person's opportunity to receive pure insight is that person themselves. Nobody can 'corrupt' you. I hear opinions all day long I disagree with and not one of them has 'corrupted' my ability to do anything. You listen to people, they respond and you make the decision whether you agree or not. Nobody can impose anything upon you.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 6:21 pm
by buffalo_girl
Who is imposing spiritual insights on people around here?
You seem to want to be right about something. I'm not arguing.
The very fact that you don't understand what it is I'm saying is exactly the point I'm trying to make.
Each person arrives at 'greater' spiritual understanding in his/her own time, according to that particular individual's level of spiritual commitment
to living the principles as exemplified in our Savior.
Spiritual progress is NOT a group undertaking. We may occupy the same general 'space' as members of the Church, and we may have the opportunity to 'practice our religion' upon one another.
Notwithstanding,
each single one of us must work out his/her own Salvation ONE-on-ONE with the
Author and Finisher of our Salvation, Jesus Christ.
Is it possible that may be one reason we are asked to NOT discuss what we have learned in our temples? What you learn from your temple experience may not be what another worthy member will learn for an additional 10 years of faithful temple attendance. That's neither bad nor good.
It is simply the difference in what one individual will need to know at that particular point in life over what you or I need to know at any given point in life.
In my experience, trying to 'teach' another person a specific insight given to me by way of 'personal revelation' - through a combined process of study, prayer, & temple attendance - has NOT proven of benefit to the person
I assume wants to share my insight.
I'm not saying it's casting '
pearls before swine'; it's more like thinking my personal spiritual insights are somehow so important they are meant for everyone
I know.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 6:39 pm
by oneClimbs
I'm not arguing either, it seems that my comment was interpreted as being accusatory when it was actually a real question. Is there a person on the forum or was there a post where someone was trying to impose their spiritual insights on people?
I do understand what you are saying however and I don't necessarily disagree with your main points either. We do progress according to our own time, but we are also supposed to help one another raise to a higher level or else missionary work is wrong. Missionary work and teaching the gospel IS a group undertaking, the whole reason for having a church we attend every Sabbath day is so we can sustain and lift one another. We lift ourselves only as fast as we lift those around us.
However the mysteries of Godliness and that which comes by revelation is impossible for one person to teach to another. The very act of trying to do it is futile. But we can point people to the path we followed so they can find what we did if that is their desire. Much like how Nephi prayed to see what his father saw. Each saw the same vision but each got something a little extra too.
The temples are a different scenario. There are many different things happening there. 1. we are making covenants ourselves, 2. we are doing it in behalf of others who have passed on, 3. we are seeking answers to prayer and wisdom, 4. we are simply seeking to learn more, 5. we are seeking to get closer to our Father in heaven, etc.
Personal revelation received in the temple or anywhere may or may not be shared, it depends on the situation and the information. The ordinances of the temple are part of the new and everlasting covenant which is outlined in our scriptures. Pretty much every principle I can think of practiced inside the temple can be studied OUTside the temple because it is all in the scriptures in one way or another. The manner of teaching utilized in the temple, however and specific ordinances and rites are reserved for the temple because that is the proper context for them. Outside of that context, they are worthless, there we agree. The rule I follow is: whatever is unique to the temple, should be left in the temple, whatever is of the temple that is in the scriptures or has been discussed by our general authorities in the open is a-ok to discuss as long as it doesn't draw out whatever is unique to the temple.
I think the more we discuss things, the more we'll find out that we both agree with each other on the level of principle.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 7:15 pm
by ChemtrailWatcher
Is there a person on the forum or was there a post where someone was trying to impose their spiritual insights on people?

Sorry. Had to laugh at that one. I guess it comes down to how you define "spiritual insights."
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 7:25 pm
by oneClimbs
Ha ha, true, true. I'm just trying to understand who is being accused of 'imposing spiritual insights'.

Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 7:40 pm
by ChemtrailWatcher

5tev3, I personally don't think you're one of those people. Not by a long shot!!
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 7:47 pm
by Original_Intent
BG I understand exactly where you are coming from.
And we certainly CAN teach each other or provide them with ideas that they are free to investigate, ponder and pray and thus we help them learn something sooner than they otherwise might have. I had the experience many times in martial arts - you teach FAR more effectively when you hint at something,a nd if it arouses their curiosity and then they go out and LEARN what you hinted at on their own - it is a FAR more valuable and ENJOYABLE experience for them than if you just hand over the information. Inisght not struggled for is not appreciated and quite honestly is unlikely to make a permanent impression than if a person is allowed to have their OWN "AHA!" moment.
Again, if the person is ready and incredibly receptive already, then sometimes we CAN just give them a large piece of the puzzle and that can be a great thing to be a part of. And if we teach with the spirit and also receive by the spirit, then we can become partners and indeed teach and be very helpful to each other.
It is kind of like the "Chances are you are going to be exalted" thread. Those who believe that pretty much all were being exalted were actually quoting the scripture saying that these things could not be taught but only revealed by the spirit! And although I realize they were only trying to be helpful in guiding others, I couldn;t help but think - "OK, you just made the argument that these things can't just be given, each indivdual pretty much has to have an amazing spiritual experience to be able to learn these things...so I get that you are implying that you have had such an experience - fine - but WHY are you trying to TEACH what the scripture you just quoted said CAN'T BE TAUGHT????" Anyway, I totally get what you are aying and agree. And again, I think the "teachers" in that other thread and also the Adam-God thread probably had the best of intentions, but really - if you really believe what you are saying, then follow the instruction given along with it.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 8:05 pm
by patriotsaint
buffalo_girl wrote:I'm not sure where you got the notion that I receive personal revelation without study, prayer, and gospel discussion.
My comments had nothing to do with
how you come to receive revelation, so I don't know where you got that notion. Your response to me seemed to indicate a belief that everyone should be left to receive their own revelation and that sharing spiritual insights with others somehow corrupted their own process of receiving revelation. For instance, you said:
So what would be the point of imposing something I learned on him?
NOT discussing what we do in the temple allows room for each to experience unprejudiced access to the Holy Spirit's direct communication
I look to Personal Revelation to answer all my questions and allow others the same privilege.
I'm saying that imposing on another person - one's own spiritual insights given in or about the temple - 'corrupts' that other person's opportunity to receive pure insight for him or herself in the temple.
If I misunderstood your meaning, then feel free to clarify. For the record, I believe that any spiritual experience can be shared as the spirit directs. That was the whole gist of my post in relation to the the original topic of this thread. I also think 5tev3 is spot on in his response to the above quotes.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 8:08 pm
by ChemtrailWatcher
How many people here think that the greatest wisdom comes from actually LIVING the principles, as BG mentioned? So many are full of talk, but very little action.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 8:10 pm
by patriotsaint
I don't think anyone would argue against the idea that the greatest wisdom comes in living principles. But that is a topic for another thread.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 8:12 pm
by ChemtrailWatcher
I don't think anyone would argue that the greatest wisdom comes in living principles. But that is a topic for another thread.
True. But I believe it is related. Yes, most people probably would not argue the point -- but how many people LIVE it???

Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 8:15 pm
by patriotsaint
ChemtrailWatcher wrote:
I don't think anyone would argue that the greatest wisdom comes in living principles. But that is a topic for another thread.
True. But I believe it is related.
Please help me connect the dots then. I thought we were discussing how much, if any, of what goes on in the temple can be discussed outside the temple. I'm not being sarcastic here, just making sure I'm on the same page as everyone else.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 8:29 pm
by oneClimbs
If it's unique to the temple, leave it in the temple.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 8:30 pm
by oneClimbs
If the temple is the right context for the teaching, then leave it in context.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 8:42 pm
by ChemtrailWatcher
Each person arrives at 'greater' spiritual understanding in his/her own time, according to that particular individual's level of spiritual commitment to living the principles as exemplified in our Savior.
This is what BG said.
Sorry patriotsaint for steering the subject in a different direction. I have a tendency of doing that sometimes. I just wanted to point out that I really love that statement.
To tell you the truth, I'm somewhat confused on this thread myself!

I'm interested in understanding better, though....
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: January 31st, 2011, 9:03 pm
by ChemtrailWatcher
I personally love reading stuff from FARMS. I find many of the insights of the scholars fascinating. Still, I have many LDS friends who I consider to be very spiritually "in tune" who spend most of their time reading straight from the scriptures (not the myriad of commentaries out there) and actually trying to live the principles on a daily basis. They teach me by example, and I tend to admire them more than those who appear to be "learned" in any subject, including gospel subjects.
What does this have to do with what is and is not appropriate to discuss outside of the temple? Not sure, but it HAS to be related somehow!
Perhaps BG is trying to say that the best lessons about the temple come from frequent attendance there? (Not from commentaries by the "learned"? -- who do tend to impose their own "spiritual insights" on others, however well-meaning they might be?)
Could this be compared to reading from the book of Isaiah? The symbolism in that book is far-reaching and extremely powerful, and yet if all we do is read the commentaries about the book of Isaiah (rather than read it, meditate and pray about it ourselves), then we are losing out on the opportunity for very valuable spiritual insight and the opportunity to commune with God on a personal basis and learn directly from Him. Sometimes those commentaries are helpful, and yet sometimes they can actually be a stumbling block.
Do the writers of commentaries on the book of Isaiah see themselves as "missionaries" in what they are doing? Probably. But do they also see that they might be doing others a disservice?
Please don't get me wrong. I'm not saying we should burn all commentaries about the book of Isaiah.

But there is a different perspective to it.
For me personally, I think commentaries and other scholarly articles have their place, and I do appreciate them a lot. I find them really fascinating. I don't believe they're necessary, though. And I don't consider what they have to say as complete gospel truth. I also tend NOT to be a frequent shopper at the local Church bookstore. I prefer to get others' spiritual insights for free if I can. Did the Saviour charge people to learn at His feet? The price for
His truth is obedience, not money. But that's another subject I guess....
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: February 1st, 2011, 6:40 am
by buffalo_girl
BG I understand exactly where you are coming from.
And we certainly CAN teach each other or provide them with ideas that they are free to investigate, ponder and pray and thus we help them learn something sooner than they otherwise might have. I had the experience many times in martial arts - you teach FAR more effectively when you hint at something,a nd if it arouses their curiosity and then they go out and LEARN what you hinted at on their own - it is a FAR more valuable and ENJOYABLE experience for them than if you just hand over the information. Inisght not struggled for is not appreciated and quite honestly is unlikely to make a permanent impression than if a person is allowed to have their OWN "AHA!" moment.
Thank you, OI! You
have understood my meaning. Your application of that principle may help clarify what I am attempting to communicate.
We each and every one have the
spiritual need to receive further instruction on a one-to-one basis with our Savior by way of the Holy Spirit until that day when we are worthy to be taught face to face
by Him. If temple worship were intended to be taught and discussed as a group, it would be taught in Gospel Doctrine.
I am certainly not saying any of this to chastise or 'twit' those who enjoy public discourse and 'commentaries'. ChemtrailWatcher is probably right in her observation that there are many Latter-day Saints who like to have their scripture study augmented by those who know a whole lot more than I do.
I love scripture and find enough light in them to keep me coming back. My temple experiences are like that, too. I learn something every time!
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: February 1st, 2011, 8:55 am
by oneClimbs
ChemtrailWatcher wrote:For me personally, I think commentaries and other scholarly articles have their place, and I do appreciate them a lot. I find them really fascinating. I don't believe they're necessary, though. And I don't consider what they have to say as complete gospel truth. I also tend NOT to be a frequent shopper at the local Church bookstore. I prefer to get others' spiritual insights for free if I can. Did the Saviour charge people to learn at His feet? The price for His truth is obedience, not money. But that's another subject I guess....
Personally, I prefer to spend most of my time in the scriptures and I have gone over the idea of purchasing books that have spiritual insights, etc. I've come to the conclusion that there isn't anything wrong with people researching a topic or sharing general principles or life experiences that could assist others in their journey. The apostles sell books and so do many others. How many of us spend our money paying $10 a ticket to see a movie just for entertainment when we could spend $10 on a book that explores truths of our existence. Books aren't free to make, they cost money, they used to sell the Book of Mormon to people in the beginning to recoup their costs.
That said, I have come to adopt Brigham Young's philosophies on seeking truth:
"Be willing to receive the truth, let it come from whom it may; no difference, not a particle. Just as soon receive the Gospel from Joseph Smith as from Peter, who lived in the days of Jesus. Receive it from one man as soon as another. If God has called an individual and sent him to preach the Gospel that is enough for me to know; it is no matter who it is, all I want is to know the truth (DBY, 11)."
"I want to say to my friends that we believe in all good. If you can find a truth in heaven, earth or hell, it belongs to our doctrine. We believe it; it is ours; we claim it (DBY, 2)."
"Mormonism," so-called, embraces every principle pertaining to life and salvation, for time and eternity. No matter who has it. If the infidel has got truth it belongs to "Mormonism." The truth and sound doctrine possessed by the sectarian world, and they have a great deal, all belong to this Church. As for their morality, many of them are, morally, just as good as we are. All that is good, lovely, and praiseworthy belongs to this Church and Kingdom. "Mormonism" includes all truth. There is no truth but what belongs to the Gospel. It is life, eternal life; it is bliss; it is the fulness of all things in the gods and in the eternities of the gods (DBY, 3).
In a word, if "Mormonism" is not my life, I do not know that I have any. I do not understand anything else, for it embraces everything that comes within the range of the understanding of man. If it does not circumscribe every thing that is in heaven and on earth, it is not what it purports to be (DBY, 2).
[The gospel] embraces all morality, all virtue, all light, all intelligence, all greatness, and all goodness. It introduces a system of laws and ordinances (DBY, 3).
Such a plan incorporates every system of true doctrine on the earth, whether it be ecclesiastical, moral, philosophical, or civil; it incorporates all good laws that have been made from the days of Adam until now; it swallows up the laws of nations, for it exceeds them all in knowledge and purity, it circumscribes the doctrines of the day, and takes from the right and the left, and brings all truth together in one system, and leaves the chaff to be scattered hither and thither (DBY, 3-4).
It is our duty and calling, as ministers of the same salvation and Gospel, to gather every item of truth and reject every error. Whether a truth be found with professed infidels, or with the Universalists, or the Church of Rome, or the Methodists, the Church of England, the Presbyterians, the Baptists, the Quakers, the Shakers, or any other of the various and numerous different sects and parties, all of whom have more or less truth, it is the business of the Elders of this Church (Jesus, their Elder Brother, being at their head) to gather up all the truths in the world pertaining to life and salvation, to the Gospel we preach, ... to the sciences, and to philosophy, wherever it may be found in every nation, kindred, tongue, and people and bring it to Zion (DBY, 248).
All knowledge and wisdom and every good that the heart of man can desire is within the circuit and circle of the faith we have embraced (DBY, 446).
It embraces every fact there is in the heavens and in the heaven of heavens--every fact there is upon the surface of the earth, in the bowels of the earth, and in the starry heavens; in fine, it embraces all truth there is in all the eternities of the Gods (DBY, 448).
Our religion measures, weighs, and circumscribes all the wisdom in the world--all that God has ever revealed to man. God has revealed all the truth that is now in the possession of the world, whether it be scientific or religious. The whole world are under obligation to him for what they know and enjoy; they are indebted to him for it all, and I acknowledge him in all things (DBY, 2).
It comprehends all true science known by man, angels, and the gods. There is one true system and science of life; all else tends to death. That system emanates from the Fountain of life (DBY, 2).
Truth will abide when error passes away. Life will remain when they who have rejected the words of eternal life are swallowed up in death. I like the truth because it is true, because it is lovely and delightful, because it is so glorious in its nature, and so worthy the admiration, faith and consideration of all intelligent beings in heaven or on the earth (DBY, 9).
I delight in this, because truth is calculated to sustain itself; it is based upon eternal facts and will endure, while all else will, sooner or later, perish (DBY, 11).
Every individual that lives according to the laws that the Lord has given to his people, and has received the blessings that he has in store for the faithful, should be able to know the things of God from the things which are not of God, the light from the darkness, that which comes from heaven and that which comes from somewhere else. This is the satisfaction and the consolation that the Latter-day Saints enjoy by living their religion; this is the knowledge which every one who thus lives possesses (DBY, 35).
How easy it is to live by the truth. Did you ever think of it, my friends? Did you ever think of it, my brethren and sisters? In every circumstance of life, no matter whether among the humble or lofty, truth is always the surest guide and the easiest to square our lives by (DBY, 11).
Our religion is simply the truth. It is all said in this one expression--it embraces all truth, wherever found, in all the works of God and man that are visible or invisible to mortal eye (DBY, 2).
I see myself in life as a 'collector'. I collect truth. Some truth is right out there in the open, some of it is buried behind scripture or history or mathematics or space and time. Some truth is between the pages of a book or within the mind of another person, the key is to be perceptive enough to detect the truths around us and draw the truth out from it's source. Everything has it's value, truth is everywhere and it is not about price or anything like that. Sometimes you have to ask for truth, sometimes you have to purchase truth and sometimes you have to cut someone's head off for truth (Think of the three ways Nephi and his brothers got the brass plates.). I'm not advocating decapitation of your neighbor for his books of course

but my point is that for all the sight the Spirit gives us, we should not be blind to what is already plain to the natural eye.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: February 1st, 2011, 10:31 am
by ChemtrailWatcher
Personally, I prefer to spend most of my time in the scriptures and I have gone over the idea of purchasing books that have spiritual insights, etc. I've come to the conclusion that there isn't anything wrong with people researching a topic or sharing general principles or life experiences that could assist others in their journey. The apostles sell books and so do many others. How many of us spend our money paying $10 a ticket to see a movie just for entertainment when we could spend $10 on a book that explores truths of our existence. Books aren't free to make, they cost money, they used to sell the Book of Mormon to people in the beginning to recoup their costs.
I can understand that, 5tev3. I'm not trying to be extreme in my views, it's just an observation I have made and have felt some internal conflict over it. That's all. I don't know how true this is, but someone on this forum once mentioned that the apostles actually give the profits from the sale of their books to the Church's mission fund. Like I say, I don't know the truth of that, but I think it's a pretty cool idea.
As for your philosophy on truth, I agree with you.

Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: February 1st, 2011, 10:43 am
by oneClimbs
I've heard the same type of thing. Whether they give the money away or use it to support themselves, it doesn't bother me either way. The greatest thing about principles is that they bring everything back to black and white, the place where most of us will find that we agree with one another.
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: February 1st, 2011, 11:03 am
by ChemtrailWatcher
The greatest thing about principles is that they bring everything back to black and white, the place where most of us will find that we agree with one another.
Huh? Not sure where you're going with this. l have a problem with "black and white."
Re: Temple Ordinances
Posted: February 1st, 2011, 11:08 am
by oneClimbs
Don't worry, it's not racial
There are no such things as gray areas, there is only black and white, right and wrong. When you get right down to principle, gray disappears. That's why there is so much confusion in the world today, we don't understand the principles. Gray only exists in our own paradigms.