Abolish the Fed? Romney: "NO."

For discussion of liberty, freedom, government and politics.
Amore Vero
captain of 100
Posts: 935

Re: Abolish the Fed? Romney: "NO."

Post by Amore Vero »

When a person repents from supporting the vilest of evils like abortion, the change in them is so huge it's unmistakeable & it's apparent to the whole world. I see no indication of this kind of change in Romney. Talk is cheap. Actions say it all.

User avatar
Original_Intent
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13156

Re: Abolish the Fed? Romney: "NO."

Post by Original_Intent »

Amore Vero wrote:When a person repents from supporting the vilest of evils like abortion, the change in them is so huge it's unmistakeable & it's apparent to the whole world. I see no indication of this kind of change in Romney. Talk is cheap. Actions say it all.
This is it exactly. I would love to support Romney, but every time I have heard him speak or seen him on television I see nothing but a slick, well groomed politician that will do whatever it takes to climb the rungs of power. Any LDS that supports him is either too lazy to do his homework or is deceived. People say the church would have gotten good worldwide exposure and therefore supporting Romney was justified. Hogwash!

User avatar
Mosby
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1197
Location: Mosby's Confederacy in the deep South of the People's Republic of Utah

Re: Abolish the Fed? Romney: "NO."

Post by Mosby »

Leeuniverse, it's obvious you have drunk the Kool-Aid on the necessity of the FedRes. Have you done ANY reading on Austrian economics? The Creature from Jekyll Island? ANY of the other books listed above? They do not list things about the Fed that need to be FIXED, they show it to be a cancer upon our society. How much cancer do you want to have?
O.I - they don't talk about Austrian economics - or the book "the creature from jekyll island" on the Mark Levin or Sean Hannity show, so it's all lost on Leeuniverse.

leeuniverse
captain of 100
Posts: 116

Re: Abolish the Fed? Romney: "NO."

Post by leeuniverse »

armedtotheteeth wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9IJUkYUbvI

I always liked this vid: "the real Romney"

I am sure a lot of you have seen it, but its worth the reminder.

I know a man can change, BUT, politicians rarely do.

Maybe someone can embed the vid. I have not look how to do it yet.
Guys, whether you want to accept it or not people DO change the views in relation to the "State" and Abortion, Romney did it, Reagon did it, and I did it. I used to believe the same as he, that the state shouldn't have the say one way or the other. But later, I like both Romney and Reagan came to realize that one of the duty's of the state was to protect life, thus, we changed out views.

Further, if you guys bothered with actually studying the facts instead of being like anti-mormons and "quote-mining" things and believing that's the "actual" truth about someone, you would know that Romney was very much so "pro-life" in office and otherwise. Pro-life groups even giving him awards etc. for his work.

Anyway, stop being like anti-mormons, and learn the WHOLE TRUTH for a change!!!

User avatar
InfoWarrior82
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 10964
Location: "There are 15 on the earth today, you can trust them completely." -President Nelson (Jan 2022)

Re: Abolish the Fed? Romney: "NO."

Post by InfoWarrior82 »

leeuniverse wrote:
armedtotheteeth wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9IJUkYUbvI

I always liked this vid: "the real Romney"

I am sure a lot of you have seen it, but its worth the reminder.

I know a man can change, BUT, politicians rarely do.

Maybe someone can embed the vid. I have not look how to do it yet.
Guys, whether you want to accept it or not people DO change the views in relation to the "State" and Abortion, Romney did it, Reagon did it, and I did it. I used to believe the same as he, that the state shouldn't have the say one way or the other. But later, I like both Romney and Reagan came to realize that one of the duty's of the state was to protect life, thus, we changed out views.

Further, if you guys bothered with actually studying the facts instead of being like anti-mormons and "quote-mining" things and believing that's the "actual" truth about someone, you would know that Romney was very much so "pro-life" in office and otherwise. Pro-life groups even giving him awards etc. for his work.

Anyway, stop being like anti-mormons, and learn the WHOLE TRUTH for a change!!!



Romney Promotes Individual Mandate:

Unconstitutional Much?

Romney Flip Flops on Abortion after he "converted" to the pro-life view in 2005

Repentant?

And the Kicker! Romney denies modern day prophets:


If you wish, I can provide loads of more information showing Mitt Romney's ignorant/intentional disregard for the original intent of the United States constitution. Just ask.

The people posting on this thread have certainly done their research and have weighed pro's and con's of Mitt Romney's political history. Just because we feel that his chronic unconstitutional views have disqualified him to be fit for any office does not make us "anti-Mormon". And if you still believe that makes us anti-Mormon, please explain yourself! Personally, what I have seen (and plenty of others), is an unrepentant, slick, pure-bred, politician, who will say and do anything to retain his office and nothing more. Does being a Mormon and voting for someone like Ron Paul instead of a Mormon politician really make us anti-Mormon? This whole thing also applies to Harry Reid. Why did you not vote for him, Leeuniverse???????? (I'm assuming here) Could it be for the same reasons we are stating about Mitt Romney perhaps!?

User avatar
armedtotheteeth
captain of 100
Posts: 473
Location: God's Land

Re: Abolish the Fed? Romney: "NO."

Post by armedtotheteeth »

Guys, whether you want to accept it or not people DO change the views in relation to the "State" and Abortion, Romney did it, Reagon did it, and I did it. I used to believe the same as he, that the state shouldn't have the say one way or the other. But later, I like both Romney and Reagan came to realize that one of the duty's of the state was to protect life, thus, we changed out views.

Further, if you guys bothered with actually studying the facts instead of being like anti-mormons and "quote-mining" things and believing that's the "actual" truth about someone, you would know that Romney was very much so "pro-life" in office and otherwise. Pro-life groups even giving him awards etc. for his work.

Anyway, stop being like anti-mormons, and learn the WHOLE TRUTH for a change!!!
He was a gun grabber, pro abortion, pro gay, and pushed in social medicine much like Obama’s!
That’s a lot to change from in little time, and I know that its possible, but IMO he does not look like a man who has a broken heart from pushing these horrible and ungodly gad rob policies.

This website has a lot to read but take the time to read thru it: http://www.massresistance.org/docs/marr ... ey/record/

Lee, if Obama or like company in less then a decade became some “stanch conservative” would you wholeheartedly trust him? Even if he said he changed? With no resent political history other then what he now states? If you would I’d say that is unwise. Did you trust Obama when he said he would be a tax cutting moderate? How many politicians say they change in there core but really to find out after election they are being moved hither and thither by political winds. Most humans are set in there views of life and the world by 25 years, but Romney and other “glory be mine” politicians seem to change their view like they change their socks.

I know one of mitts sons, I have met mitt several times, I used to be a big supporter but I can’t in good conscience vote for him now. I can’t get inside his heart of hearts and see his true feelings, so to be safe, as we do with all people who have made hideous mistakes, I won’t put him in a position to hurt himself and others again; just like I wouldn’t put a repented Oxycontin addict to work in a pharmacy.

User avatar
Mahonri
Master
Posts: 3949
Location: Where you want to be when crap hits the fan, but I'm not telling.

Re: Abolish the Fed? Romney: "NO."

Post by Mahonri »

Who he is supporting for Senate races across the country shows he has not "repented" even a little.

Bennett, McCain, etc, etc, etc.

randont
captain of 10
Posts: 45

Re: Abolish the Fed? Romney: "NO."

Post by randont »

Mosby wrote:
I will vote for Romney, and trust the Lord to use Romney as he see's fit.

I know who's in charge!

Bob
And that folks is exactly why we as a people both as Latter-Day Saints and Americans are doomed to suffer like we will.

The Lord (who IS in charge) has told us through his servants time and time again to seek out good honest men who sustain the Constitution, the cause of Liberty and the laws of God- Romney is well short on all accounts.
It vexes me that this council is so blatantly disregarded. The spirit of apostasy is alive and well unfortunately.

User avatar
Col. Flagg
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 16961
Location: Utah County

Re: Abolish the Fed? Romney: "NO."

Post by Col. Flagg »

Voting 'no' on abolishing the 'Fed' is akin to someone saying they don't mind being financially raped by a bunch of private banksters. :lol: The dollar has lost 95% of its value since 1971 because of the 'Fed'. In other words, 95 cents in 2010 is what 5 cents bought you in 1971. That is a 1,900% inflation rate in 39 years or 48.7% annual inflation since '71, which is the reason it now takes 2-3 incomes to survive. I can't think of a more perfect way to destroy people or families than to de-value their earnings. That is the 'Fed' for you, but its criminal operation goes well beyond just that since the individual income tax is nothing but legalized thievery and their collections agency, the IRS, is just like Nazi Germany's Gestapo (that uses threats, intimidation, force and imprisonment) to collect for its blood-sucking host. It creates money out of thin air and then loans it to the U.S. Mafia at interest (which is what the income tax pays). I've written to Sen. Orrin Hatch about the criminality, illegality and unconstitutionality of the 'Fed' and he wrote back saying he saw nothing wrong with it and that their 'policies' are sound. :lol: Romney is your typical politician unfortunately, which we need less of and a 'no' vote for abolishing the 'Fed' shows his true colors. :oops: He can't even begin to hold a candle to people like Ron Paul or Chuck Baldwin!

Post Reply