O'Reilly Says Mitt Romney Will Be Next President

[moonwhim]

go to original article link at bottom to see O'Reilly video

Bill O’Reilly Says “Fiscal Tough Guy” Romney Will Be Next President

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
June 23, 2010

Fox News “conservative” (who has proposed a national sales tax) Bill O’Reilly says the next president will be obliged to cut the federal budget. He predicts Mitt Romney will fill the order. But as Carla Howell writes, Romney is anything but a fiscal tough guy of the sort O’Reilly demands.


Romney has not only raised taxes in Massachusetts, he has expanded the budget. Romney’s budget cuts, writes Howell, “were merely budget games. Spending cuts in one area were simply moved into another area of the budget.” The Massachusetts state budget was $22.7 billion a year when he took office in January of 2003, but when he left office four years later, it was over $25.7 billion — plus another $2.2 billion in spending that the legislature took “off budget.”


“The net effect of budgets proposed and signed into law by Mitt Romney? An additional $5.2 billion in state spending — and a similar increase in new taxes. Every year.”
Romney teamed up with the late Teddy Kennedy to burden the people of Massachusetts with government mandated health care. “Voters of Massachusetts did not vote for RomneyCare. Mitt Romney foisted the granddaddy of Big Government expansions upon them without warning. He championed it from the beginning. Again, without any prodding from his Democrat rivals,” writes Howell.

Maybe Bill O’Reilly likes Mitt because he proposed and then foisted new taxes on the people of Massachusetts. In December, 2009, Bill debated Glenn Beck on what sort of additional tax burden to impose on the American people. Bill advocated a sales tax and Beck argued in favor of a value added tax. These guys claim to be opposed to big government. They are highly paid whores for the global elite and the banksters.

Bankster Shills GLENN BECK & BILL O'REILLY Call For MORE TAXES On The AMERICAN PEOPLE:: ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYRZgIL-hUk&fea ... r_embedded


When he ran for Governor of Massachusetts in 2002, Romney proposed three new taxes — a new tax on vehicles, a new tax on campaign donations, and a new tax on building construction. “Each of the four years Romney served as governor, he raised taxes — while pretending he didn’t. He claims he only raised mandatory government ‘fees.’ But government mandatory fees are nothing but taxes, and taxes are nothing but mandatory government fees. Romney’s new tax-fees raised hundreds of millions of dollars in new tax revenue for the state government every year.” He also closed “loopholes” that allowed the state to impose an internet sales tax.

Mitt Romney is a tax and spend Republican. Bill O’Reilly knows this. O’Reilly is pushing Mitt as president because the banksters want the debt they sold to the government paid off and in the process turn the American people into serfs and debt slaves. It is Bill’s job to get a “fiscal tough guy” who is in fact a tax and spender in the Oval Office.

“The chief problem of American political life for a long time has been how to make the two Congressional parties more national and international,” said CFR historian Carrol Quigley. “The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so the that American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.”


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article printed from Infowars: http://www.infowars.com

URL to article: http://www.infowars.com/bill-oreilly-sa ... president/

[Jason]

Let's hope and pray that never happens!!!

[Col. Flagg]

Let's hope and pray that never happens!!!

Amen to that, although, I'd rather see Mitt in the White House than any of the other cast of characters and goons in DC who might have a shot (the exception being Ron Paul of course). Thing is, I'm not sure I'd want to be the prez when our financial day of reckoning arrives in this country ... and it ain't far off.

[SmallFarm]

I think it'll be either Sarah Palin or Hillary Clinton.

[Jason]

Let's hope and pray that never happens!!!

Amen to that, although, I'd rather see Mitt in the White House than any of the other cast of characters and goons in DC who might have a shot (the exception being Ron Paul of course). Thing is, I'm not sure I'd want to be the prez when our financial day of reckoning arrives in this country ... and it ain't far off.

Nah...I'd rather see Obama or a whole host of other characters. Last thing we need is a dirty Mormon president....

[Fiannan]

Let's hope and pray that never happens!!!

Oh come on...Romney has a bit of a political stripe to him but he is not as low as Harry Reid. Romney would be a great president.

[Original_Intent]

Wow, guess I need to start making the anti-Romney Youtubes of him laughing at Ron Paul's suggestion that the economy was heading for the rocks.

I'd take Hucksterbee over Romney, and that guy turns my stomach!

[Mahonri]

Let's hope and pray that never happens!!!

Oh come on...Romney has a bit of a political stripe to him but he is not as low as Harry Reid. Romney would be a great president.

Really???

Mitt:
mandatory health care: Check
supporting of youth gay pride events: Check
supporting gun bans: Check
supporting tax dollars going to private business: Check
Supporting strengthening international institutions like the UN: Check
says God has not spoken to man since Moses: Check
says the president can go to war without congress: check


guy is sleaze

[Mosby]

ARRRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Romney and Beck for V.P- perfect combo

[Fiannan]

And who do you want? Ron Paul is wonderful but has as much chance of getting elected as Thomas S. Monson has of being appointed the next Catholic pope. Romney has more chance of getting independents than Palin as well. Look, we now have a Sunni president so I think most people would not mind having a Mormon president.

[Mahonri]

And who do you want? Ron Paul is wonderful but has as much chance of getting elected as Thomas S. Monson has of being appointed the next Catholic pope. Romney has more chance of getting independents than Palin as well. Look, we now have a Sunni president so I think most people would not mind having a Mormon president.

I don't care about winning, I care about not choosing a pervert, gun grabbing war monger that will take money from me to give to others. Since we are accountable for our actions in relation to government, then if we choose a gun grabbing pervert thief, and we get a pervert gun grabbing thief, then I will be held accountable for what part I played in that. If I chose what was right, then I will not be held guilty for the evil that was chosen by others.

[Original_Intent]

And who do you want? Ron Paul is wonderful but has as much chance of getting elected as Thomas S. Monson has of being appointed the next Catholic pope. Romney has more chance of getting independents than Palin as well. Look, we now have a Sunni president so I think most people would not mind having a Mormon president.

Funny, and probably true, but if it is true it is only because of people who do not fulfil their civic duty to learn correct principles or lack the intestinal fortitued of voting thier conscience becasue they would rather pick a winner than vote their conscience.

I would have to see YEARS of a change of heart before I would even give Romney the time of day, let alone my vote.

[Mosby]

Romney has more chance of getting independents than Palin as well.

No way, "independents" are usually independent- because they have had enough of the two-party circus, and they are usually well read and studied, hence zero votes for an establishment guy like Romney.

Palin actually looks good next to Romney

[Quiet Cricket]

Even Harry Reid does political/legal favors for the church. Might as well have someone sympathetic to the church in office rather than a bunch of equals only they don't like the church.

If Ron Paul or someone like him doesn't win, I hope Romney gets it.

[moonwhim]

If Romney gets elected then all the Mormons will go back to sleep, thinking all is well in Zion!

[Fiannan]

I will say this -- when Party Leader Barack Obama met with the president of BP (for 20 minutes) he went in there with as much hatred for private corporations as he has for the US military. With such an atmosphere nothing is likely to be accomplished to clean up this oil spill, except Glorious Leader will use the opportunity to milk BP for whatever he can get as well as advance his cause to shut down US oil exploration.

Romney has gone head to head with private corporations and, while he respects free enterprise, he knows how to get the ball rolling, while not coming across as some spoiled narcisist. We need that right now.

As for Reid, he is about as useful to the Church as Baltar was to the Quorum of the 12 in the original Battlestar Galactica.

[Original_Intent]

I am sorry, selecting leaders based on how inclined they might or might not be to help the church politically is FAR DOWN on my list of criteria.

In Romney's case, I'm not even sure I believe he would have the inclination.

Second of all, even if he were so inclined, it would be the end of his career if he ever got caught doing the least favorable thing for the church. Mitt would not risk it.

Third of all even if he would risk it, I am not sure that an inclination to do the church any special favors based on being in a high office is even a desirable trait that we should support.

[leeuniverse]

Man you guys are so "gullible"..... You fall for infowars propaganda hook line and sinker. You are utterly clueless that infowars on many issues are just like Liberals and Anti-Mormons. They use a little truth to tell great lies about Conservatives and other issues. They misrepresent O'Reilly's and Glenn's positions, as well they misrepresent Romney and what he did. There are MORE FACTS to the so-called facts infowars uses to create their LIES against these people.

You are just little drones no better than the so-called drones you condemn.

Romney for President and Allen West for VP. Palin would be okay for VP, but West would be better.

[shadow]

If Romney gets elected then all the Mormons will go back to sleep, thinking all is well in Zion!

I wonder how many apostles donated money to Romney's campaign??

Just rockin' the boat!

[moonwhim]

Man you guys are so "gullible"..... You fall for infowars propaganda hook line and sinker. You are utterly clueless that infowars on many issues are just like Liberals and Anti-Mormons. They use a little truth to tell great lies about Conservatives and other issues. They misrepresent O'Reilly's and Glenn's positions, as well they misrepresent Romney and what he did. There are MORE FACTS to the so-called facts infowars uses to create their LIES against these people.

You are just little drones no better than the so-called drones you condemn.

Romney for President and Allen West for VP. Palin would be okay for VP, but West would be better.

It is easy to make accusations, lets see the facts explaining the "great lies."

[SmallFarm]

Man you guys are so "gullible"..... You fall for infowars propaganda hook line and sinker. You are utterly clueless that infowars on many issues are just like Liberals and Anti-Mormons. They use a little truth to tell great lies about Conservatives and other issues. They misrepresent O'Reilly's and Glenn's positions, as well they misrepresent Romney and what he did. There are MORE FACTS to the so-called facts infowars uses to create their LIES against these people.

You are just little drones no better than the so-called drones you condemn.

Romney for President and Allen West for VP. Palin would be okay for VP, but West would be better.

It is easy to make accusations, lets see the facts explaining the "great lies."

This is lee's schtick moonwhim. When he can't come up with anything solid he resorts to petty namecalling

[sbsion]

what he doesn't KNOW.............there won't be a "next president"?

[Quiet Cricket]

I am sorry, selecting leaders based on how inclined they might or might not be to help the church politically is FAR DOWN on my list of criteria.

In Romney's case, I'm not even sure I believe he would have the inclination.

Second of all, even if he were so inclined, it would be the end of his career if he ever got caught doing the least favorable thing for the church. Mitt would not risk it.

Third of all even if he would risk it, I am not sure that an inclination to do the church any special favors based on being in a high office is even a desirable trait that we should support.

I'm not selecting Romney as my leader. Of the people I don't support I'd rather have Romney is all I'm saying. I agree that throwing secret favors into bills seems shady, but I have good reason to believe that Reid does it. And why would he if the thing was not requested by church leadership? And if it was requested, then I support it. Giving bribes in Latin America is the norm in government. Does the church do bribes in Latin America to avoid problems? I don't know, but I heard it does. I don't know how I feel about it all exactly, but it may be similar to Nephi killing Laban. Why didn't the Lord let Nephi get the plates without killing?

I'm not sure it would have to be risky to do things that favor the church if it was not known that the church would benefit. If the church comes against a wall somewhere, a government official might be able to do something without it appearing on the outside that it would benefit any specific group.

[bobhenstra]

I am sorry, selecting leaders based on how inclined they might or might not be to help the church politically is FAR DOWN on my list of criteria.

In Romney's case, I'm not even sure I believe he would have the inclination.

Second of all, even if he were so inclined, it would be the end of his career if he ever got caught doing the least favorable thing for the church. Mitt would not risk it.

Third of all even if he would risk it, I am not sure that an inclination to do the church any special favors based on being in a high office is even a desirable trait that we should support.

I'm not selecting Romney as my leader. Of the people I don't support I'd rather have Romney is all I'm saying. I agree that throwing secret favors into bills seems shady, but I have good reason to believe that Reid does it. And why would he if the thing was not requested by church leadership? And if it was requested, then I support it. Giving bribes in Latin America is the norm in government. Does the church do bribes in Latin America to avoid problems? I don't know, but I heard it does. I don't know how I feel about it all exactly, but it may be similar to Nephi killing Laban. Why didn't the Lord let Nephi get the plates without killing?

I'm not sure it would have to be risky to do things that favor the church if it was not known that the church would benefit. If the church comes against a wall somewhere, a government official might be able to do something without it appearing on the outside that it would benefit any specific group.

We (the church membership) are going to be tested, doesn't matter who the president is. I would support Romney, but how about General Petraeus for all you "Greek" watchers?

Bob

[Mosby]

Man you guys are so "gullible"..... You fall for infowars propaganda hook line and sinker. You are utterly clueless that infowars on many issues are just like Liberals and Anti-Mormons. They use a little truth to tell great lies about Conservatives and other issues. They misrepresent O'Reilly's and Glenn's positions, as well they misrepresent Romney and what he did. There are MORE FACTS to the so-called facts infowars uses to create their LIES against these people.

You are just little drones no better than the so-called drones you condem

Facts Hannity?