Interesting. Thanks! I'm under the impression that people used to be able to talk about central banking without being labeled a conspiracy theorist. It's unfortunate we currently cannot discuss new ideas or want to improve the model without being labeled fringe. This model will eventually crack and bleed so much that it will be a popular topic again.larsenb wrote:According to the late Alan Stang (as in the sting of Stang), columnist, radio talk-show host, Rush was given an in-depth, months long seminar on the grand conspiracy sometime back in the late '60's-early '70's by a very knowledgeable friend of Alan's.JMarsigli wrote: I've listened to the talking heads enough to know they know. You don't recommend Austrian economists that rail on our current monetary structure without having a clue. Rush is a very smart man and knows a lot more than you or I.
Rush knows. Rush also knows who made him wealthy. Rush knows how to shut up and what to avoid. Maybe part of his drug problem stemmed from knowing what a shill he's been. He chomps at the bit now and again for the same reason. Remember after the presidential primaries when he said he wasn't going to carry water anymore for the Party, or the Bush regime, etc.?
Rush!
-
JMarsigli
- captain of 100
- Posts: 442
Re: Rush!
- pjbrownie
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3070
- Location: Mount Pleasant, Utah
Re: Rush!
Not so sure it's wise to label all who have voices "controlled opposition" just because they have a contract with Rupert Murdoch. Even Murdoch himself maybe an secret underminer. Only time will tell. They maybe under certain elements of influence or have certain topics labeled off-limits, but it's going to be impossible to control everyone who has a microphone. I just finished reading the Rise and Fall of the Third Reich and was very surprised about the elements of opposition in Nazi Germany before, during the war, and in the midst of its collapse. There were people in power all over the place who hated Hitler, worked in secret to undermine him, yet seemed in public to support him. Watch the Nuremburg trials. Add to the fact that we are a quasi-open society (as opposed to Nazi Germany), and this kind of systematic opposition would just be astronomically larger.Quiet Cricket wrote:Interesting thought Bob. I hadn't considered talk show hosts "waking up" as being a declaration of control or a threat.bobhenstra wrote:The ptb's, organized crime, ldg's, in the past didn't have the power over the people of this country they have now. "Now" they want the people to "know" who's in charge,Very good point. A lot of them know behind the scenes politics; it has to be obvious to them. So in my mind it's one of two things: they do it for the money, or they are actively part of it all. (of course the latter is for money as well)5tev3 wrote:I don't believe that any of these guys, who are as knowledgeable as they are and who know personally many of these people in Washington and the big movers and shakers are 'just coming around' to the facts.
Just because someone doesn't scream Bilderberger, Illuminati, Trilateral Commission, 911 Truth, etc. etc. every five minutes does not mean they don't believe. "There are many things I believe that I will not say, but I will never say anything I do not believe." - Glenn Beck.
