A FUN little win today from Justice COURT

[Wiikwajio]

Years ago I learned about the ALL CAPS argument. I could prove nothing either way but I have an extreme distrust for the the government and they would not tell me why they always spelled my name WRONG. I could not prove the PAYtriots right but I could not prove them wrong.

The basic argument is ALL CAPS by the government makes you into essentially a Corporation and you lose your God given rights and fall into the privilege category. Considering that EVERY document you get from the government that is an ID is spelled in ALL CAPS and almost every letter you get from the government is addressed in ALL CAPS it bothered me.

In fact it bothered me no end so I fought against the government spelling my name WRONG.

I even forced Clark County, Nevada, to change the election ballots from ALL CAPS to normal standard spelling of Names N. Names. That drove Harvard Lomax NUTZ.

But the Courts have fought me on it doing all they could to force me to use ALL CAPS which I would not do or simply refusing to spell my name correctly. In order to better fight them on this issue I include this in the 13 Testaments of Truth.

#6. We Recognize as Truth that any form of numerical identification or NAME CHANGE, such as the Social Security Identification Number and/or a NEW SATANIC NAME, of individual Sovereigns or their children is a direct violation of the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth, and Thirteenth Amendments to the Constitution and is, either a precursor to or in actuality, the prophesied numerical satanic “Mark of the Beast” and we reject them on both legal and religious grounds.

Last month I filed a motion to dismiss an alleged traffic ticket. It began like this:

True Name
Defendant, on August 11th in the year of our Lord 2009 was denied his right to give his “true name” by Judicial Officer Kelley, Robert A. as required by NRS 174.025:
NRS 174.025 Proceedings respecting name of defendant; entry of true name in minutes; subsequent proceedings in true name. When the defendant is arraigned, he must be informed that if the name by which he is prosecuted is not his true name he must then declare his true name, or be proceeded against by the name in the indictment, information or complaint. If he gives no other name, the court may proceed accordingly; but, if he alleges that another name is his true name, the court must direct an entry thereof in the minutes of the arraignment, and the subsequent proceedings on the information, indictment or complaint may be had against him by that name, referring also to the name by which he was first charged therein. (Emphasis added)

Defendant refused to plea as his rights had been violated by the Judicial Officer Kelley and a plea of “Not Guilty” was entered over Defendant’s objection.
Therefore Defendant does, herein, demand that his true name, The Most Honorable Christopher Hansen, (spelling in upper and lower case letters is religiously required by Defendant’s faith) be used in all subsequent proceedings on the information, indictment or complaint may be had against him by that name, referring also to the name by which he was first charged therein. This name is a part of Defendant’s religious sentiment and the State of Nevada must secure a perfect toleration of such religious sentiment as per the 2nd Irrevocable Ordinance found in the PRELIMINARY ACTION of the Nevada Constitution:
That perfect toleration of religious sentiment shall be secured, and no inhabitant of said state shall ever be molested, in person or property, on account of his or her mode of religious worship.

Today I got the Court Order granting my motion and I got a sweet surprise.

THE STATE OF NEVADA was in ALL CAPS. The DA DAVID ROGERS was in ALL CAPS. The Chief Deputy District Attorney GLEN P. O'BRIEN was in ALL CAPS. Those last two names were in ALL CAPS EVERYWHERE, both in the body and the heading and even on the signature line.

But Christopher Hansen was in the heading and in the body and it was spelled Christopher Hansen.

I have been told time and again that it was IMPOSSIBLE to NOT SPELL MY NAME IN ALL CAPS. I just proved that was not true. It was little win, compared to the total dismissal of the two Driving on Suspended License charges and a failing to slow down alleged charge that had total fines in excess of 2,500 FRNS but I knew I would win those. It was a pleasant surprise that they spelled my name right.

Yes. I know they did not use the The Most Honorable part but that battle is just getting started.

The fun part is it just drives the government nuts when you refuse to do it the way they want you to do it and they cannot tell you why they REQUIRE you to do it.

Question everything. Refuse to do anything they cannot prove your are required to do by law no matter how small because if they cannot tell you why it is required then you volunteer to do it and then if it is bad or hurts your liberties you are stuck and have to figbht twice as hard to free yourself.

"Show me the law" should be standard when dealing with the government.

[pritchet1]

Watch this series after you have created your UCC-1 and Addendum regarding getting your sovereignty back;

Dorothy Gale (of Oz) in court
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/6031743/

[Wiikwajio]

Watch this series after you have created your UCC-1 and Addendum regarding getting your sovereignty back;

Dorothy Gale (of Oz) in court
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/6031743/

Have you ever seen that tried or tried in in a courtroom, Brother?

I do not use UCC. I do not like all the traps involved and have yet to see it work well because it is too complicated for the average man.

I certainly do not wait outside the Courtroom waiting for the judge to enter. We file pre-hearing documents that include our religious objections to standing for the judge since he does not carry the Bible into the court room any more. That is why people stood. They stood for the Bible. Therefore we don't have to rise.

At the last hearing, where I could not pre-file anything, I simply told the Bailiff I could not rise because of my religious objections to such a demonstration. He went into the judge and the judge told the bailiff I was right and did not have to rise if I have a religious objection to such a demonstration.

Then he demanded ID and I gave him affidavits from my brother and sister with my pictures on them and he went nutz. I told him he had better get approval from the judge before depriving me of my right to a hearing and he went back to the judge. He came out and said: If it was up to me I would throw you outta here." And I responded: "But it is not up to you and that is why I am still here. And remember this, boy, the last time a Bailiff in this court house violated my rights I pocketed 17 grand and he lost his job. So watch yourself cause I will not hesitate to sue you." He left me alone after that.

I NEVER call the judge "your honor" as I do not know if he has any honor. I always do my research on the alleged judge before going to court and if he is a judge (one of the alleged judges I faced last year was only a "judicial officer") then I call him judge. If not I call him sir.

I file papers clearly stating that my name is The Most Honorable Christopher Hansen. Then if the Court demands I use their titles I demand they use my title since they are the public servants and I am a member of the sovereignty. I treat them with the same level of respect they offer me and not the slightest bit more.

I normally get my way one way or the other. They do not like the lack of respect being shown in front of all the voluntary serfs normally in the courtroom. They do not want to awaken a sleeping giant or worry that the news media may be in the courtroom.

I have heard that UCC arguments work but as I wrote I have yet to see it demonstrated in any courtroom where I attended. The guys usually choke or the judge just has them arrested. I am certainly not quick enough on my feet to win using UCC arguments so I use what works for me.

If that works for you, tell me how, Brother.

[pritchet1]

The last time I was in court, I did not know about the proper verbage, etc. as demonstrated by "Dorothy" in the videos linked above. I am in process of gaining my sovereignty with the UCC forms. Filling them out wasn't too difficult. I submitted the first time, but did not list my "business" correctly. The 2nd time I left the business portion out. I'm still waiting for final from my state secretary, so I can then own my strawman.

I have found that some folks write their names as "first-middle: last", that clues me in that they have jumped through the hoops and have copyrighted their names and act as agents or authorized representatives for their strawman.

All courts are based on Commercial Law and I have discovered that the courts are nothing more than a revenue generator extension of the bankster system. Note: If you have enough money, know the correct words showing you know the system, you can commit murder and walk out of court as a "free" person. (Just sayin')

Otherwise, walk in with a pile of W-9s for distribution to those employed by the court, as needed.

[Wiikwajio]

The last time I was in court, I did not know about the proper verbage, etc. as demonstrated by "Dorothy" in the videos linked above. I am in process of gaining my sovereignty with the UCC forms. Filling them out wasn't too difficult. I submitted the first time, but did not list my "business" correctly. The 2nd time I left the business portion out. I'm still waiting for final from my state secretary, so I can then own my strawman.

I have found that some folks write their names as "first-middle: last", that clues me in that they have jumped through the hoops and have copyrighted their names and act as agents or authorized representatives for their strawman.

All courts are based on Commercial Law and I have discovered that the courts are nothing more than a revenue generator extension of the bankster system. Note: If you have enough money, know the correct words showing you know the system, you can commit murder and walk out of court as a "free" person. (Just sayin')

Otherwise, walk in with a pile of W-9s for distribution to those employed by the court, as needed.

Keep us informed of your progress. I know that people that do this work hard at it. I have heard of victories but have seen none. So keep us updated.

[pritchet1]

I'm not planning to be in court anytime soon. I do plan on doing the UCC-1 thIng and A4V THING, HOWEVER.

[ithink]

Years ago I learned about the ALL CAPS argument. I could prove nothing either way but I have an extreme distrust for the the government and they would not tell me why they always spelled my name WRONG. I could not prove the PAYtriots right but I could not prove them wrong.

The basic argument is ALL CAPS by the government makes you into essentially a Corporation and you lose your God given rights and fall into the privilege category. Considering that EVERY document you get from the government that is an ID is spelled in ALL CAPS and almost every letter you get from the government is addressed in ALL CAPS it bothered me.

In fact it bothered me no end so I fought against the government spelling my name WRONG.

I even forced Clark County, Nevada, to change the election ballots from ALL CAPS to normal standard spelling of Names N. Names. That drove Harvard Lomax NUTZ.

But the Courts have fought me on it doing all they could to force me to use ALL CAPS which I would not do or simply refusing to spell my name correctly. In order to better fight them on this issue I include this in the 13 Testaments of Truth.

#6. We Recognize as Truth that any form of numerical identification or NAME CHANGE, such as the Social Security Identification Number and/or a NEW SATANIC NAME, of individual Sovereigns or their children is a direct violation of the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth, and Thirteenth Amendments to the Constitution and is, either a precursor to or in actuality, the prophesied numerical satanic “Mark of the Beast” and we reject them on both legal and religious grounds.

Last month I filed a motion to dismiss an alleged traffic ticket. It began like this:

True Name
Defendant, on August 11th in the year of our Lord 2009 was denied his right to give his “true name” by Judicial Officer Kelley, Robert A. as required by NRS 174.025:
NRS 174.025 Proceedings respecting name of defendant; entry of true name in minutes; subsequent proceedings in true name. When the defendant is arraigned, he must be informed that if the name by which he is prosecuted is not his true name he must then declare his true name, or be proceeded against by the name in the indictment, information or complaint. If he gives no other name, the court may proceed accordingly; but, if he alleges that another name is his true name, the court must direct an entry thereof in the minutes of the arraignment, and the subsequent proceedings on the information, indictment or complaint may be had against him by that name, referring also to the name by which he was first charged therein. (Emphasis added)

Defendant refused to plea as his rights had been violated by the Judicial Officer Kelley and a plea of “Not Guilty” was entered over Defendant’s objection.
Therefore Defendant does, herein, demand that his true name, The Most Honorable Christopher Hansen, (spelling in upper and lower case letters is religiously required by Defendant’s faith) be used in all subsequent proceedings on the information, indictment or complaint may be had against him by that name, referring also to the name by which he was first charged therein. This name is a part of Defendant’s religious sentiment and the State of Nevada must secure a perfect toleration of such religious sentiment as per the 2nd Irrevocable Ordinance found in the PRELIMINARY ACTION of the Nevada Constitution:
That perfect toleration of religious sentiment shall be secured, and no inhabitant of said state shall ever be molested, in person or property, on account of his or her mode of religious worship.

Today I got the Court Order granting my motion and I got a sweet surprise.

THE STATE OF NEVADA was in ALL CAPS. The DA DAVID ROGERS was in ALL CAPS. The Chief Deputy District Attorney GLEN P. O'BRIEN was in ALL CAPS. Those last two names were in ALL CAPS EVERYWHERE, both in the body and the heading and even on the signature line.

But Christopher Hansen was in the heading and in the body and it was spelled Christopher Hansen.

I have been told time and again that it was IMPOSSIBLE to NOT SPELL MY NAME IN ALL CAPS. I just proved that was not true. It was little win, compared to the total dismissal of the two Driving on Suspended License charges and a failing to slow down alleged charge that had total fines in excess of 2,500 FRNS but I knew I would win those. It was a pleasant surprise that they spelled my name right.

Yes. I know they did not use the The Most Honorable part but that battle is just getting started.

The fun part is it just drives the government nuts when you refuse to do it the way they want you to do it and they cannot tell you why they REQUIRE you to do it.

Question everything. Refuse to do anything they cannot prove your are required to do by law no matter how small because if they cannot tell you why it is required then you volunteer to do it and then if it is bad or hurts your liberties you are stuck and have to figbht twice as hard to free yourself.

"Show me the law" should be standard when dealing with the government.

An all CAPS name is called a "nom de guerre" or "name of war". You need one when you go to admiralty court, which is why they protest so much when you wish to conduct your common law affairs with your christian name. I did this in traffic court. I preferred to stand for the whole thing. I responded to my name, but said I was a stand in for the fictious 3rd party corporate entity the government had created on my behalf. I had no idea what the judge was going to do since I've never heard of this done before. Tellingly, the judge did not try to equate me with the governments papers, he simply asked me to do it myself, and when I refused, he said fine, we'll proceed without "YOU".

[ithink]

I certainly do not wait outside the Courtroom waiting for the judge to enter. We file pre-hearing documents that include our religious objections to standing for the judge since he does not carry the Bible into the court room any more. That is why people stood. They stood for the Bible. Therefore we don't have to rise.

As a kid in elementary school, I refused to sing God Save the Queen. It just felt wrong. At that time, I'd already read the BoM numerous times so I knew how I should feel, and singing that just wasn't right. I remember a teacher who I knew was watching me and probably wondering why I didn't sing for the Queen, since I felt fine about singing "O Canada.... God keep our land, glorious and free....". I think many people feel something is not right, but they aren't sure where to turn or how to go about these things. Please keep sharing with us Wiikwajio, there is much to learn and although you are American, much of the theory can be applied here in Canada even though the details are different.

[pritchet1]

The background from this may help. It will be published (publicly available) in my magazine June 1st;

http://www.maccompanion.com/macc/archiv ... 20Bond.htm

[larsenb]

Fascinating stuff. I'm learning something. Prichett, thanks for your web link. Wiikwajio, I love how you've learned to stand up for your rights in the face of police/judicial power.

[pritchet1]

What started my research into thisA4V stuff was Chris Hansen's (not my blood relative, that I know of) issues with the word and value of "dollar" last year. I didn't "get it". Now I do. Thanks Wii!

[pritchet1]

Also I need to give credit to Brian M. (LDS Freemen) for helping me not take things at face value. The caveats discussed in my research were because of his valuable feedback.

[Wiikwajio]

[ An all CAPS name is called a "nom de guerre" or "name of war". You need one when you go to admiralty court, which is why they protest so much when you wish to conduct your common law affairs with your christian name. I did this in traffic court. I preferred to stand for the whole thing. I responded to my name, but said I was a stand in for the fictious 3rd party corporate entity the government had created on my behalf. I had no idea what the judge was going to do since I've never heard of this done before. Tellingly, the judge did not try to equate me with the governments papers, he simply asked me to do it myself, and when I refused, he said fine, we'll proceed without "YOU".

I have heard this many times but I have yet to see any hard evidence that it is true.

Tell us what the judge did without "YOU."

And my case was rather different than anything I had faced in the past. There was simply, no charging instrument. CHRISTOPHER HANSEN was not charged. Neither was Christopher Hansen.

Someone won and it was not the DA.

I will soon be suing the DA and the Cops in Federal Court on 1983 violations.

[Wiikwajio]

I certainly do not wait outside the Courtroom waiting for the judge to enter. We file pre-hearing documents that include our religious objections to standing for the judge since he does not carry the Bible into the court room any more. That is why people stood. They stood for the Bible. Therefore we don't have to rise.

As a kid in elementary school, I refused to sing God Save the Queen. It just felt wrong. At that time, I'd already read the BoM numerous times so I knew how I should feel, and singing that just wasn't right. I remember a teacher who I knew was watching me and probably wondering why I didn't sing for the Queen, since I felt fine about singing "O Canada.... God keep our land, glorious and free....". I think many people feel something is not right, but they aren't sure where to turn or how to go about these things. Please keep sharing with us Wiikwajio, there is much to learn and although you are American, much of the theory can be applied here in Canada even though the details are different.

My life is a never ending experience. I will continue to share my lunacy.

My brother, the attorney, recently asked me why all these things happened to me. I told him that God gave me so many opportunities to fight the Beast because so many of His other children shrunk from these opportunities. I told him I was given the ability and the inspiration to fight and win and that I took no credit for any of the wins and totally responsibility for all of the losses. When God fights your battles for you it makes wins that much easier.

I love your story about the songs. I used to be a gung ho Pledge Allegiance to the Flag kind of guy. Now you could not pay me to say that awful anti-freedom pledge that is nothing more than a prayer in support of National Socialism.

And NO. I don't care if the Prophet says the pledge or not. I was told by the Spirit to stop supporting National Socialism and so I did.

By the way... We have not been commanded in General Conference to say the Pledge or sing God save the Queen so I do not care what anyone's opinion is on the subject, even if they are an apostle.

I still love the flag. It even upsets me when I see a torn and tattered flag flying anywhere. I still love the National anthem because I don't make a pledge in that. I like God Bless America better but I don't believe God will bless America except to punish it for its never ending international murders and theft. I make no promises in the National anthem.

But I no longer fly the flag. The flag shows support for the servants running this country into ruin. Flying it today is like flying the Nazi flag. I just cannot bring myself to do it.

I will stand for the flag when it passes by or is brought into a room... as long as it does not have gold fringe on it. I guess old loves died hard. I never put my hand on my heart any more. I just feel sad when I see that flag being a rallying point for Fascism.

[Wiikwajio]

The background from this may help. It will be published (publicly available) in my magazine June 1st;

http://www.maccompanion.com/macc/archiv ... 20Bond.htm

This is what I have been unable to prove.

You" don't own “yourself” -- the Federal Reserve does

“Within two weeks and three days, each Certificate of Live Birth is to be filed in Washington D.C. Evidence reveals that there is even a Federal Children Department established by the Shepherd/Townsend Act of 1922 under the Department of Commerce that appears to be involved in this process in some way. Every citizen is given a number (the red number on the Birth Certificate) and each live birth is valued at from 650,000 to 750,000 Federal Reserve dollars in collateral from the Fed.”
From: The Federal Reserve Owns Your Life

My Grandchildren will have no birth certificates.

[Wiikwajio]

What started my research into thisA4V stuff was Chris Hansen's (not my blood relative, that I know of) issues with the word and value of "dollar" last year. I didn't "get it". Now I do. Thanks Wii!

What do you get? I need all the input on this I can get. And you are more than welcome.

[Wiikwajio]

Fascinating stuff. I'm learning something. Prichett, thanks for your web link. Wiikwajio, I love how you've learned to stand up for your rights in the face of police/judicial power.

Thanks...But all credit goes to the Lord. I honestly was kicked fighting and screaming all the way, into this.

It really was my wife that gave me the ultimate ultimatum. She was just 18 and we had been married for only a few months when she told me that if I ever filed a 1040 Return ever again she would divorce me. The Spirit told me in no uncertain terms that I should listen to her. The main thing I keep hearing in my head was: " No accomplishment makes up for failure in the home." And: Do what is right let the consequence follow. Battle for freedom in spirit and might, And with stout hearts look ye forth for tomorrow. God will protect you; then do what is right."

At 8 she went on a hunger strike at Catholic School because they would not explain the trinity. At 10 she decided to never file a tax return because it supported immorality. At 16 she joined the Church without another member of her family being a member. Her Grand mother would no longer even talk to her. At 17 she agreed to marry me in 5 days after I met her. My PB says the girl for me would readily accept my proposal of marriage. I had asked two other girls and they did not readily accept. I stopped seeing them. There were others that would have said she instantly but I knew they were not the right girl. She would get up out of bed at night and run and grab one of our four kids, always the right one, and run them to the bathroom where they would throw-up in the toilet. This happened several times. And that is just one of crazy stories about knowing things about the kids or about me. You would have to be CRAZY to lie to my wife. She knows.

I have always, since that day she gave me the ultimatum, felt as though God has protected us in these crazy battles. When I got the letters from the IRS telling me that according to their records that we were not required to file I knew it was the Lord.

I also felt like I was set up so that I was forced to fight or give in a be a slave. And even when I lost I felt like it was just a learning experience preparing for the next one AND IT ALWA?YS WAS. The First time I use the Religious Freedom Restoration Act was before the US Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional as applied to the States. I learned more about the system in that loss than I ever learned at one time ever since then. And I really did not lose much. It was a VERY small fine.

Weird things happen to me. Like this last traffic incident. Why didn't the Cop get me to sign the ticket? It is required by law to get me to sign it and then give me a copy. It was like the Lord confused his mind to protect me. The second Cop even told the first Cop they needed to go and get me to sign the tickets and the first Cop told him they did not need to.

Then, right after I win, nearly the same thing happens to another member of the Fellowship. We have them all set up AGAIN. I feel as though my life is very orchestrated.

The things happening with my home right now are simply miraculous. I may end up with it for free. And it is a REALLY nice house.

24 Consider the ravens: for they neither sow nor reap; which neither have storehouse nor barn; and God feedeth them: how much more are ye better than the fowls?
25 And which of you with taking thought can add to his stature one cubit?
26 If ye then be not able to do that thing which is least, why take ye thought for the rest?
27 Consider the lilies how they grow: they toil not, they spin not; and yet I say unto you, that Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
28 If then God so clothe the grass, which is to day in the field, and to morrow is cast into the oven; ahow much more will he clothe you, O ye of little faith?

I am literally watching this happen in my life RIGHT NOW.

All praise be unto the Lord.

[ithink]

[ An all CAPS name is called a "nom de guerre" or "name of war". You need one when you go to admiralty court, which is why they protest so much when you wish to conduct your common law affairs with your christian name. I did this in traffic court. I preferred to stand for the whole thing. I responded to my name, but said I was a stand in for the fictious 3rd party corporate entity the government had created on my behalf. I had no idea what the judge was going to do since I've never heard of this done before. Tellingly, the judge did not try to equate me with the governments papers, he simply asked me to do it myself, and when I refused, he said fine, we'll proceed without "YOU".

I have heard this many times but I have yet to see any hard evidence that it is true.

Tell us what the judge did without "YOU."

And my case was rather different than anything I had faced in the past. There was simply, no charging instrument. CHRISTOPHER HANSEN was not charged. Neither was Christopher Hansen.

Someone won and it was not the DA.

I will soon be suing the DA and the Cops in Federal Court on 1983 violations.

I think the nom de guerre is just a name for this. I too have asked a retired "judge" and a current lawyer what they think about it and they both said they'd never heard about it. I asked the lawyer why they type names in all CAPS, and he just said it was a convention. I'm not buying that myself since it is known that a corporation MUST spell their name in all caps on all their legal documentation.

As for the judge, he proceeded without "ME", and convicted "ME". "i" ended up paying for "ME".

[ithink]

I still love the flag. It even upsets me when I see a torn and tattered flag flying anywhere. I still love the National anthem because I don't make a pledge in that. I like God Bless America better but I don't believe God will bless America except to punish it for its never ending international murders and theft. I make no promises in the National anthem.

But I no longer fly the flag. The flag shows support for the servants running this country into ruin. Flying it today is like flying the Nazi flag. I just cannot bring myself to do it.

I will stand for the flag when it passes by or is brought into a room... as long as it does not have gold fringe on it. I guess old loves died hard. I never put my hand on my heart any more. I just feel sad when I see that flag being a rallying point for Fascism.

Ditto for our flag, ditto for the gold fringed subjugated flags. Interestingly, God saved the most severe punishment in 3 Nephi for the city of Jacobeth, because "it was they that did destroy the government of my people". I put this in here lest anyone think this is an anti government tirade. It is not. It is pro government, for real government, not the poseur that now sits on the respective capitol hill.

[ithink]

The background from this may help. It will be published (publicly available) in my magazine June 1st;

http://www.maccompanion.com/macc/archiv ... 20Bond.htm

This is what I have been unable to prove.

You" don't own “yourself” -- the Federal Reserve does

“Within two weeks and three days, each Certificate of Live Birth is to be filed in Washington D.C. Evidence reveals that there is even a Federal Children Department established by the Shepherd/Townsend Act of 1922 under the Department of Commerce that appears to be involved in this process in some way. Every citizen is given a number (the red number on the Birth Certificate) and each live birth is valued at from 650,000 to 750,000 Federal Reserve dollars in collateral from the Fed.”
From: The Federal Reserve Owns Your Life

My Grandchildren will have no birth certificates.

I would like someone to explain why we have red numbers on our birth certs here in Canada as well. Any legal minds here that understand the significance of a colored number on the back of a document? How about you Australians and Brits, what's on your certs?

[pritchet1]

If you read my research, it is the same in all countries that speak English and operate under Admiralty law.

All Law is Commerce. Learn Commerce-speak and you can get through court.

[usaf916]

This whole topic really, really intrigues me. Any good sites where I could do some good reading. Good for you guys standing up, J. Ruben Clark would be proud!

[pritchet1]

Go through the "Digging Deeper" section on the web page below.

http://www.maccompanion.com/macc/archiv ... 20Bond.htm

[usaf916]

Go through the "Digging Deeper" section on the web page below.

http://www.maccompanion.com/macc/archiv ... 20Bond.htm

Thanks for the link!

[Wiikwajio]

This whole topic really, really intrigues me. Any good sites where I could do some good reading. Good for you guys standing up, J. Ruben Clark would be proud!

http://www.independentamerican.org/

http://www.sovereignfellowship.com/

http://sedm.org/