Doesn't mean much. This paper is not peer reviewed, and will be disbelieved because Einstein's relativity predicts black holes to exist. By using and changing Einstein's already wrong equations, and by using wrong standard dogma quantum models, the math is still wrong, and this is not the way to prove that black holes do not exist. Electric Universe scientists have already done it, like all the empty center supernovas that explode near the galaxy center, making so much dust, that they think a black hole lies at the galaxy center.
Why Black Holes Don't Exist (Stephen Crothers)
Einstein theoretical Mathematical assumptions is why folks believe in black holes to begin with even though not one person has ever observed one. I find it funny that these folks are saying black holes don't exist because of the math when at the same time black holes exist because of math. It's as if they're trying to disprove that leprechauns exist by using high level mathematics.
Laura Mersini-Houghton is mentioned in the link above which she proves mathematically that black holes don't exist.
“I’m still not over the shock,” said Mersini-Houghton. “We’ve been studying this problem for a more than 50 years and this solution gives us a lot to think about.”
For decades, black holes were thought to form when a massive star collapses under its own gravity to a single point in space – imagine the Earth being squished into a ball the size of a peanut – called a singularity.
It evolved from a "singularity"? ... that would mean there was "something" there to begin with ... the "cause" of the singularity was??? ... But this goes against the foundation of big bang cosmology that there was "nothing" before the BB? .... Just where do you start with these people. If it is shown singularities do exist, then it's bye bye big bang cosmology, audios Einstein. So the paper does call into question the big bang but It suggests that a star actually undergoes all of the stellar evolutionary stages--including stopping just short of a singularity!Many physicists and astronomers believe that our universe originated from a singularity that began expanding with the Big Bang. However, if singularities do not exist, then physicists have to rethink their ideas of the Big Bang and whether it ever happened.
This way they can postulate more ideas on how the big bang derives, too, from this "almost singularity." It's similar to the Rosetta/ESA team having to regroup and "revolutionize" their ideas about comets by keeping the dirty snowball idea no matter what they happen to see that contradicts that theory.
It is also interesting to note that within the past year Stephen Hawking also claimed that black holes don't exist.
So Stephen Hawking says that a matter-gobbling object as beloved of relativists & Big Bangers is an impossibility as it disobeys Quantum theory - and says there is NO Event Horizon at all. :ymparty: Apparently the whole process is all very mysterious as it either obeys Quantum or Relativity but not both.“There is no escape from a black hole in classical theory,” Hawking told Nature. Quantum theory, however, “enables energy and information to escape from a black hole”. A full explanation of the process, the physicist admits, would require a theory that successfully merges gravity with the other fundamental forces of nature. But that is a goal that has eluded physicists for nearly a century. “The correct treatment,” Hawking says, “remains a mystery.”
http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawk ... es-1.14583" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I have pointed out somewhere in this thread the conundrum about black holes ... how they went from gobbling up everything, as matter disappeared forever into utter oblivion, to then somehow becoming the most fertile objects imaginable ... spewing forth matter and giving rise to all creation. Now the great Stephen Hawking can't reconciling this. Why did it take him (one of the most intelligent minds alive today) so long to realize this? What happened? =)) So thank you, I guess, Mr. Hawking for giving the Holy Anointing on something we already know!
"The laws of gravity and quantum theory allow universes to appear spontaneously from Nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going. The universe can create itself out of nothing, and God is no longer necessary.” -Steven Hawking
Hawking Still in the Dark on Black Holes | Space News"General Relativity is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king..., its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists...
I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view." -Nikola Tesla
