Thanks.CuriousThinker wrote: ↑January 14th, 2025, 8:18 amIsaiah 8:19. There's a reason they were called peep stones.Shawn Henry wrote: ↑January 14th, 2025, 12:00 amWhich scriptures are you referring to that forbid the use of seer stones?CuriousThinker wrote: ↑January 13th, 2025, 2:32 pm Joseph started using a seer stone at 14. He was heavy into peeping and finding buried treasure as is attested to in his court case. He said there were guardian spirits watching treasure and when they would dig it would always become slippery and they never got any. (Sounds familiar?) He never disavowed it and used one he found to "translate" the Book of Mormon. The question is, would God use something that he forbids in scripture to bring about more scripture?
To be fair, this verse calls out "wizards that peep" and doesn't mention stones. It was American culture that connected the two words peep and stone. Now, it could be that we rightfully made the connection. My preference is to not have any stones involved, just pure revelation, but that may not be how it works. The saints were definitely guilty of looking unto Joseph as a peeping wizard and he performed the role well, but I don't know that his later revelatory failures should automatically take down the BoM too. I think the BoM stands on its own.
Good question though, what is the Lord's purest way to transmit scripture?