What makes it less despicable?
Is it less murderous in such a circumstance?
What makes it less despicable?
Just think for one second. If the pregnancy is going to kill the mother it's going to kill the baby too. In those circs it becomes a choice between two deaths or one.
Just think for a second.
So, you're married to a young woman who's 8 weeks pregnant and suffering eclampsia. You think the right moral choice is to sit back and watch her and the fetus slowly and inevitably die. You don't think she should even have a say in that.Luke wrote: ↑November 8th, 2024, 12:35 amJust think for a second.
If killing someone else means that you get to live as opposed to both dying naturally, does that make it less of a murder?
“You can’t see this” “You think this” “You think that”NeveR wrote: ↑November 8th, 2024, 1:15 amSo, you're married to a young woman who's 8 weeks pregnant and suffering eclampsia. You think the right moral choice is to sit back and watch her and the fetus slowly and inevitably die. You don't think she should even have a say in that.
You can't see this is just as twisted in its ways as allowing late term abortions of healthy babies.
This is the danger of absolutist thinking. It always leads to immoral things being done in the name of morality.
It would be more along the lines of self defense than murder. Or a medical emergency.
Post by MikeMaillet »
What makes it murder in one circumstance and not murder in another? What distinguishes the two?MikeMaillet wrote: ↑November 8th, 2024, 8:36 am If a woman freely allows Mr. Johnson into her home and gets pregnant, the destruction of the fetus is a sin akin to murder. If a woman's home is entered without her consent (includes incest) and she gets pregnant, the woman has every right to have that fetus removed. If a pregnant woman may die because of complications due to pregnancy, the life of the mother should be preserved.
This is how I see it as a Christian man but my opinions are always subject to change.
Mike
Post by MikeMaillet »
Like I said, this is merely an opinion. If a person is raped I see no issue with the removal of the fetus. It was placed there against a woman's wish and in a most foul manner. I don't see a problem here. The same applies for incest wherein a most grievous violation has taken place and a most sacred trust has been broken.Luke wrote: ↑November 8th, 2024, 9:17 amWhat makes it murder in one circumstance and not murder in another? What distinguishes the two?MikeMaillet wrote: ↑November 8th, 2024, 8:36 am If a woman freely allows Mr. Johnson into her home and gets pregnant, the destruction of the fetus is a sin akin to murder. If a woman's home is entered without her consent (includes incest) and she gets pregnant, the woman has every right to have that fetus removed. If a pregnant woman may die because of complications due to pregnancy, the life of the mother should be preserved.
This is how I see it as a Christian man but my opinions are always subject to change.
Mike
Post by logicalheart »
Post by nightlight »
Excellent postlogicalheart wrote: ↑November 9th, 2024, 7:44 pm Doctors who want to make money performing infanticide will have no guilt in letting mothers die to convince the public to support infanticide.
LDSFreedomForum.com and its admin / moderators do not necessarily agree with all content posted by users of this forum.
The views and content on this site reflect only the opinions and teachings of the authors of the respective content contained herein.