I would agree.spiritMan wrote: ↑January 28th, 2023, 7:15 amI think it's stupid for members not to have e-mail addresses of the GAs. So incredibly dumb.endlessQuestions wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 4:46 pmDue to some people's perception of my level of integrity, I was provided access to this information.InfoWarrior82 wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 4:25 pm How did you get the email addresses of all the general authorities??
I'll just say this as well... I had the opportunity to use some information I was provided that I decided was too personal to use. I chose instead to simply use their official corporate emails, since the patterns that are involved there are actually a matter of public record, and could be deduced by anyone interested in going to the trouble.
Fair enough?
This idea that we lay members should have some sort of barrier between us and our leadership just doesn't fly, in my opinion.
It's not scriptural.
It's not doctrinal.
It's not practical.
They are public figures. They should be willing and anxious to engage with the public. To minister to them. To reason with them. To answer their questions. To testify boldly of their allegiance to Jesus Christ. And so on and so on.
In my opinion, of course.