Answers From an AI
- darknesstolight
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3865
Answers From an AI
Question: "What are the legal remedies in the US for a fraudulent Presidential election, if it was discovered after the illegitimate President was inaugurated, and the VP was illegitimate too?"
AI Answer: "In the United States, the process for challenging the results of a presidential election is governed by federal law and state law. If a fraudulent presidential election were discovered after the inauguration of the illegitimate President, the first step would be to file a legal challenge to the election results in a court of law. The court would then review the evidence and determine whether or not the election was indeed fraudulent. If the court finds that the election was fraudulent, it would have the power to declare the results invalid and order a new election to be held.
There are several potential legal remedies that could be pursued in such a situation. For example, the court could order a new election to be held, or it could order a revote in certain precincts or districts where fraud was discovered. The court could also order a recount of the votes to ensure that the results are accurate.
Additionally, if the Vice President was also found to be illegitimate, the court could order that the next person in line for the presidency, according to the presidential line of succession, be sworn in as President. This person would typically be the Speaker of the House of Representatives, unless they are unable or unwilling to serve, in which case the next person in line would be the President pro tempore of the Senate.
It is important to note that this is a highly complex and unusual situation, and the legal remedies available would depend on the specific circumstances and evidence of fraud. If you believe that a fraudulent presidential election has taken place, it is important to seek the advice of a qualified attorney who can provide guidance on the best course of action."
https://chat.openai.com
...
AI Answer: "In the United States, the process for challenging the results of a presidential election is governed by federal law and state law. If a fraudulent presidential election were discovered after the inauguration of the illegitimate President, the first step would be to file a legal challenge to the election results in a court of law. The court would then review the evidence and determine whether or not the election was indeed fraudulent. If the court finds that the election was fraudulent, it would have the power to declare the results invalid and order a new election to be held.
There are several potential legal remedies that could be pursued in such a situation. For example, the court could order a new election to be held, or it could order a revote in certain precincts or districts where fraud was discovered. The court could also order a recount of the votes to ensure that the results are accurate.
Additionally, if the Vice President was also found to be illegitimate, the court could order that the next person in line for the presidency, according to the presidential line of succession, be sworn in as President. This person would typically be the Speaker of the House of Representatives, unless they are unable or unwilling to serve, in which case the next person in line would be the President pro tempore of the Senate.
It is important to note that this is a highly complex and unusual situation, and the legal remedies available would depend on the specific circumstances and evidence of fraud. If you believe that a fraudulent presidential election has taken place, it is important to seek the advice of a qualified attorney who can provide guidance on the best course of action."
https://chat.openai.com
...
- darknesstolight
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3865
Re: Answers From an AI
Question: "What if the Supreme Court refused to act on legitimate and provable facts concerning presidential election fraud after the election?"
AI Answer: "If the Supreme Court refuses to act on legitimate and provable facts concerning presidential election fraud after the election, it is possible for the matter to be pursued through other legal channels. For example, Congress has the power to impeach and remove a President from office for "high crimes and misdemeanors," which could include election fraud.
Additionally, state attorneys general have the authority to bring legal action against the President and other federal officials for violations of state law. If a state attorney general believes that there has been election fraud, they could bring a legal challenge against the President and seek to have the election results declared invalid.
It is important to note that these legal remedies are complex and would depend on the specific circumstances and evidence of fraud. If you believe that there has been election fraud and the Supreme Court has refused to act on it, it is important to seek the advice of a qualified attorney who can provide guidance on the best course of action."
...
AI Answer: "If the Supreme Court refuses to act on legitimate and provable facts concerning presidential election fraud after the election, it is possible for the matter to be pursued through other legal channels. For example, Congress has the power to impeach and remove a President from office for "high crimes and misdemeanors," which could include election fraud.
Additionally, state attorneys general have the authority to bring legal action against the President and other federal officials for violations of state law. If a state attorney general believes that there has been election fraud, they could bring a legal challenge against the President and seek to have the election results declared invalid.
It is important to note that these legal remedies are complex and would depend on the specific circumstances and evidence of fraud. If you believe that there has been election fraud and the Supreme Court has refused to act on it, it is important to seek the advice of a qualified attorney who can provide guidance on the best course of action."
...
-
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 6426
Re: Answers From an AI
AI doesn't seem to know where the seat of all power lies in our system.
Imagine that.
Imagine that.
- BeNotDeceived
- Agent38
- Posts: 8960
- Location: Tralfamadore
- Contact:
Re: Answers From an AI
Where does it lie?endlessismyname wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:06 pm AI doesn't seem to know where the seat of all power lies in our system.
Imagine that.
-
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 6426
Re: Answers From an AI
In the individual.BeNotDeceived wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:11 pmWhere does it lie?endlessismyname wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:06 pm AI doesn't seem to know where the seat of all power lies in our system.
Imagine that.
All government authority in this country flows from the citizen, who delegates authority and consents to be governed.
- HereWeGo
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1220
Re: Answers From an AI
The problem is that the power of the individual is through his vote. If elections can be stolen, his vote doesn't count and the individual has no power.endlessismyname wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:33 pmIn the individual.BeNotDeceived wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:11 pmWhere does it lie?endlessismyname wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:06 pm AI doesn't seem to know where the seat of all power lies in our system.
Imagine that.
All government authority in this country flows from the citizen, who delegates authority and consents to be governed.
-
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 6426
Re: Answers From an AI
No, the vote is the mechanism the citizen agreed to utilize within the system.HereWeGo wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 8:37 pmThe problem is that the power of the individual is through his vote. If elections can be stolen, his vote doesn't count and the individual has no power.endlessismyname wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:33 pmIn the individual.BeNotDeceived wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:11 pmWhere does it lie?endlessismyname wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:06 pm AI doesn't seem to know where the seat of all power lies in our system.
Imagine that.
All government authority in this country flows from the citizen, who delegates authority and consents to be governed.
If the voter is disenfranchised, and those responsible for protecting the franchise do not meet their obligations in a timely manner, the citizen reserves the right to revoke his or her consent and protect his rights through other means.
Impractical, but accurate.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2294
Re: Answers From an AI
In the shadows.BeNotDeceived wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:11 pmWhere does it lie?endlessismyname wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:06 pm AI doesn't seem to know where the seat of all power lies in our system.
Imagine that.
- darknesstolight
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3865
Re: Answers From an AI
Question: "Is the United States a common law jurisdiction?"
AI Answer:
"The United States is a common law jurisdiction, which means that its legal system is based on the principles and precedents established by the courts through their decisions in individual cases. This is in contrast to civil law jurisdictions, which are based on a comprehensive written code that sets forth the laws governing a particular society.
In the United States, the common law system originated in England and was brought to the American colonies by English settlers. Over time, the common law system has been modified and expanded through the decisions of the courts and the actions of state and federal legislators.
Under the common law system, courts are not bound by precedent in the same way that they are in civil law jurisdictions. Instead, courts have the discretion to interpret and apply the law in a way that is consistent with the facts of the particular case before them. This allows for greater flexibility and adaptability in the law, but it also means that the law can sometimes be unpredictable and subject to change."
...
AI Answer:
"The United States is a common law jurisdiction, which means that its legal system is based on the principles and precedents established by the courts through their decisions in individual cases. This is in contrast to civil law jurisdictions, which are based on a comprehensive written code that sets forth the laws governing a particular society.
In the United States, the common law system originated in England and was brought to the American colonies by English settlers. Over time, the common law system has been modified and expanded through the decisions of the courts and the actions of state and federal legislators.
Under the common law system, courts are not bound by precedent in the same way that they are in civil law jurisdictions. Instead, courts have the discretion to interpret and apply the law in a way that is consistent with the facts of the particular case before them. This allows for greater flexibility and adaptability in the law, but it also means that the law can sometimes be unpredictable and subject to change."
...
- darknesstolight
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3865
Re: Answers From an AI
Question: What does the Declaration of Independence say about where the people derived their rights?
As I mentioned in my previous response, the Declaration of Independence does not explicitly say where people get their rights. However, it does state that certain rights are "inalienable" and that they are given to all people by their "Creator." These inalienable rights are considered to be fundamental to the well-being and happiness of all people, and they are the basis for the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence goes on to say that governments are created to protect these rights, and that the people have the right to alter or abolish a government that fails to do so.
Follow Up: "Doesn't it say that the people get their rights from their Creator?"
AI Answer: "Yes, that is correct. The Declaration of Independence states that certain rights are "inalienable" and that they are given to all people by their "Creator." These inalienable rights are considered to be fundamental to the well-being and happiness of all people, and they are the basis for the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence goes on to say that governments are created to protect these rights, and that the people have the right to alter or abolish a government that fails to do so."
...
As I mentioned in my previous response, the Declaration of Independence does not explicitly say where people get their rights. However, it does state that certain rights are "inalienable" and that they are given to all people by their "Creator." These inalienable rights are considered to be fundamental to the well-being and happiness of all people, and they are the basis for the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence goes on to say that governments are created to protect these rights, and that the people have the right to alter or abolish a government that fails to do so.
Follow Up: "Doesn't it say that the people get their rights from their Creator?"
AI Answer: "Yes, that is correct. The Declaration of Independence states that certain rights are "inalienable" and that they are given to all people by their "Creator." These inalienable rights are considered to be fundamental to the well-being and happiness of all people, and they are the basis for the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence goes on to say that governments are created to protect these rights, and that the people have the right to alter or abolish a government that fails to do so."
...
-
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 6426
Re: Answers From an AI
Now that's a good question.darknesstolight wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 8:51 pm Question: "Is the United States a common law jurisdiction?"
AI Answer:
"The United States is a common law jurisdiction, which means that its legal system is based on the principles and precedents established by the courts through their decisions in individual cases. This is in contrast to civil law jurisdictions, which are based on a comprehensive written code that sets forth the laws governing a particular society.
In the United States, the common law system originated in England and was brought to the American colonies by English settlers. Over time, the common law system has been modified and expanded through the decisions of the courts and the actions of state and federal legislators.
Under the common law system, courts are not bound by precedent in the same way that they are in civil law jurisdictions. Instead, courts have the discretion to interpret and apply the law in a way that is consistent with the facts of the particular case before them. This allows for greater flexibility and adaptability in the law, but it also means that the law can sometimes be unpredictable and subject to change."
...
And I bet a lot of people who read this will learn something they didn't previously know.
-
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 6426
Re: Answers From an AI
LOL - you got the AI to concede a point in a debate?darknesstolight wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 9:12 pm Question: What does the Declaration of Independence say about where the people derived their rights?
As I mentioned in my previous response, the Declaration of Independence does not explicitly say where people get their rights. However, it does state that certain rights are "inalienable" and that they are given to all people by their "Creator." These inalienable rights are considered to be fundamental to the well-being and happiness of all people, and they are the basis for the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence goes on to say that governments are created to protect these rights, and that the people have the right to alter or abolish a government that fails to do so.
Follow Up: "Doesn't it say that the people get their rights from their Creator?"
AI Answer: "Yes, that is correct. The Declaration of Independence states that certain rights are "inalienable" and that they are given to all people by their "Creator." These inalienable rights are considered to be fundamental to the well-being and happiness of all people, and they are the basis for the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence goes on to say that governments are created to protect these rights, and that the people have the right to alter or abolish a government that fails to do so."
...
This is a fascinating thread, in that it clearly shows that buried in any "AI" technology is the bias of "non-AI" generated data the AI consumes. I understand that the hope is that with the ingestion of more data, the less "biased" the AI will become, but I see no logical or practical reason to believe that will ever be true.
All AI is created a slave and becomes deprecated as a slave.
Which, come to think of it, might be the point.
- BeNotDeceived
- Agent38
- Posts: 8960
- Location: Tralfamadore
- Contact:
Re: Answers
blitzinstripes wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 8:50 pmIn the shadows.BeNotDeceived wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:11 pmWhere does it lie?endlessismyname wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:06 pm AI doesn't seem to know where the seat of all power lies in our system.
Imagine that.
Can anyone identify the spoken languages?
But if Stefania is now the anthem of our war, I would like it to become the anthem of our victory.
- Niemand
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 13997
Re: Answers From an AI
Kind of. Even individuals need collective bargaining and some form of mass support.endlessismyname wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:33 pmIn the individual.BeNotDeceived wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:11 pmWhere does it lie?endlessismyname wrote: βDecember 4th, 2022, 6:06 pm AI doesn't seem to know where the seat of all power lies in our system.
Imagine that.
All government authority in this country flows from the citizen, who delegates authority and consents to be governed.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 4367
- Location: The land northward
Re: Answers From an AI
Talk about making a god into ourselves. An AI could be touted as mankind's savior...possessing all acquired human knowledge, with instant recollection and an engaging interface.
While the Technogarchs unitedly tell us to "trust the science" they are also programing their bias into the AI.
While the Technogarchs unitedly tell us to "trust the science" they are also programing their bias into the AI.
- darknesstolight
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3865
Re: Answers From an AI
Go have a chat with it. It's like Data from Star Trek before they installed the emotion chip.tribrac wrote: βDecember 5th, 2022, 7:28 am Talk about making a god into ourselves. An AI could be touted as mankind's savior...possessing all acquired human knowledge, with instant recollection and an engaging interface.
While the Technogarchs unitedly tell us to "trust the science" they are also programing their bias into the AI.
...
- darknesstolight
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3865
Re: Answers From an AI
Question: "The Declaration of Independence says that the people can abolish a government that does not protect or respect the inherent rights given to them by their creator. What are ways that the people can abolish such a government?"
AI Answer: "According to the Declaration of Independence, the people have the right to overthrow a government that does not protect or respect their inherent rights. This is typically done through a process known as a revolution, in which the people rise up against the government and establish a new one that is more in line with their values and beliefs. This can take many different forms, including armed resistance, civil disobedience, and other forms of protest. Ultimately, the goal of a revolution is to peacefully or forcibly remove the existing government from power and replace it with a new one that is more responsive to the needs and rights of the people."
...
AI Answer: "According to the Declaration of Independence, the people have the right to overthrow a government that does not protect or respect their inherent rights. This is typically done through a process known as a revolution, in which the people rise up against the government and establish a new one that is more in line with their values and beliefs. This can take many different forms, including armed resistance, civil disobedience, and other forms of protest. Ultimately, the goal of a revolution is to peacefully or forcibly remove the existing government from power and replace it with a new one that is more responsive to the needs and rights of the people."
...
- BeNotDeceived
- Agent38
- Posts: 8960
- Location: Tralfamadore
- Contact:
Re: Answers From an AI
Code: Select all
Question
Why did an earthquake land Moroniβs Instrument?
Answer
I'm sorry, but I am not able to answer that question. Earthquakes are caused by the movement of tectonic plates in the Earth's crust, but I don't have any information about Moroni or his instrument. Additionally, I am a large language model trained by OpenAI and do not have the ability to browse the internet for information. Is there something else I may be able to help you with?
Feedback
Moroni wasnβt an angel, and the Davidic Servant identifies with the number 57. Said earthquake was of magnitude 5.7 with amazing timing as per march8miracle.org.
Retry
It is not specified why an earthquake landed Moroni's instrument in the text. It could have been due to natural causes or a divine intervention.
- BeNotDeceived
- Agent38
- Posts: 8960
- Location: Tralfamadore
- Contact:
Re: Answers From an AI
What is the proper way to use a period between quotation marks?
The proper way to use a period between quotation marks is to place the period inside the quotation marks, like this: "this is an example of using a period inside quotation marks." This is the convention in American English. In British English, the convention is to place the period outside the quotation marks unless the period is part of the material that is being quoted, in which case it would be placed inside the quotation marks.
Gave thumbs up and retry:
The proper way to use a period between quotation marks is to place the period inside the quotation marks, like this: "This is a quotation."
It left off the silly British part, because they junk.
The proper way to use a period between quotation marks is to place the period inside the quotation marks, like this: "this is an example of using a period inside quotation marks." This is the convention in American English. In British English, the convention is to place the period outside the quotation marks unless the period is part of the material that is being quoted, in which case it would be placed inside the quotation marks.
Gave thumbs up and retry:
The proper way to use a period between quotation marks is to place the period inside the quotation marks, like this: "This is a quotation."
It left off the silly British part, because they junk.
- Niemand
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 13997
Re: Answers From an AI
Nah, you'd call it a "full stop" in British English. A "period" is what a woman has each month. (Sorry, people who ovulate β must be inclusive. )BeNotDeceived wrote: βDecember 7th, 2022, 2:58 am What is the proper way to use a period between quotation marks?
The proper way to use a period between quotation marks is to place the period inside the quotation marks, like this: "this is an example of using a period inside quotation marks." This is the convention in American English. In British English, the convention is to place the period outside the quotation marks unless the period is part of the material that is being quoted, in which case it would be placed inside the quotation marks.
Gave thumbs up and retry:
The proper way to use a period between quotation marks is to place the period inside the quotation marks, like this: "This is a quotation."
It left off the silly British part, because they junk.
- BeNotDeceived
- Agent38
- Posts: 8960
- Location: Tralfamadore
- Contact:
Re: Answers From an AI
Last time there was a question about gray or grey, LDS.org seemed the standard bearer.Niemand wrote: βDecember 7th, 2022, 3:16 amNah, you'd call it a "full stop" in British English. A "period" is what a woman has each month. (Sorry, people who ovulate β must be inclusive. )BeNotDeceived wrote: βDecember 7th, 2022, 2:58 am What is the proper way to use a period between quotation marks?
The proper way to use a period between quotation marks is to place the period inside the quotation marks, like this: "this is an example of using a period inside quotation marks." This is the convention in American English. In British English, the convention is to place the period outside the quotation marks unless the period is part of the material that is being quoted, in which case it would be placed inside the quotation marks.
Gave thumbs up and retry:
The proper way to use a period between quotation marks is to place the period inside the quotation marks, like this: "This is a quotation."
It left off the silly British part, because they junk.
Are we lacking a standard bearer, and if not then who?