Because.Christianlee wrote: ↑December 1st, 2022, 1:42 am I do not understand why the Church didn’t say in the original statement, “We cannot support this bill unless it clearly supports the religious freedom rights of those who for religious reasons oppose same sex marriage.” Instead it seems to endorse the bill without specifically outlining what religious freedom provision is adequate. It is interesting that four supposedly conservative Utah Congressmen voted in favor of the original House bill which had no religious freedom provisions. I can’t believe they would have done that without at least some input from the Church. Most GOP House members voted against the original bill. Utah must be a mess on LGBQT issues now. The Church seems to be trying to appease the wrong side.
Someone in the leadership.
Is a double agent.
Playing the game of Let's Pretend.
Pretending to be a Conservative Member.
Kinda like a RINO.
Looks that way to me anyway.
Sir H