The association from the cited passage is ambiguous.endlessismyname wrote: ↑January 7th, 2022, 10:16 amDon’t think so. Unless by IS you mean “is a subsidiary of” or “feeds members into”. It seems pretty clear there are two distinct entities at play.briznian wrote: ↑January 7th, 2022, 9:38 am Owl & Key IS Skull & Bones. Just another name:
https://utahcommhistory.com/2018/12/18/ ... y-of-utah/
In the end, I’m just wondering why it is these leaders are joining secret societies at all. Every college kid on earth knows the kinds of things you have to do to be initiated… and they aren’t exactly wholesome recreation if you know what I mean.
However, the Owl and Key society at the UofU was established in 1910, a year after the UofU Skull and Bones. They also seem to have initiated the induction of women into their organizations about the same time. Then you have the example both in your post and in the article cited of two Skull and Bones members being selected to be Owl and Key.
Yeh, they seem to be connected.
The rites of the Yale Skull and Bones are indeed repellent, and if the UofU rites are similar, shame on Robert Hales. Then you have the story of the Yalies robbing the skull of Geronimo from his grave and incorporating it into their ceremonies . . . .