Alex Jones ordered to pay a billion dollars to Sandy Hook families

[InfoWarrior82]

They did hand all over the Google analytics that was required. Apparently the judge didn't care or believe it. Take your pick.

When?

The first time.

Let's see if anyone out there who has been banned from all things Google is still able to access that data. Do you know?

So they both disclosed it and couldn't access the data?

I heard it speculated that they first tried to tell them they couldn't get to it. Then the judge got mad and requested it again. They then sent screenshots. Then the judge defaulted.

[Artaxerxes]

When?

The first time.

Let's see if anyone out there who has been banned from all things Google is still able to access that data. Do you know?

So they both disclosed it and couldn't access the data?

I heard it speculated that they first tried to tell them they couldn't get to it. Then the judge got mad and requested it again. They then sent screenshots. Then the judge defaulted.

That's at least much closer to the truth. Here's what happened:

Screenshot_20221013-171902.png (844.93 KiB) Viewed 480 times

They did not provide the information until a few days before trial.

[InfoWarrior82]

The first time.

Let's see if anyone out there who has been banned from all things Google is still able to access that data. Do you know?

So they both disclosed it and couldn't access the data?

I heard it speculated that they first tried to tell them they couldn't get to it. Then the judge got mad and requested it again. They then sent screenshots. Then the judge defaulted.

That's at least much closer to the truth. Here's what happened:
Screenshot_20221013-171902.png

They did not provide the information until a few days before trial.

Who is Jordan Campbell?

[Artaxerxes]

So they both disclosed it and couldn't access the data?

I heard it speculated that they first tried to tell them they couldn't get to it. Then the judge got mad and requested it again. They then sent screenshots. Then the judge defaulted.

That's at least much closer to the truth. Here's what happened:
Screenshot_20221013-171902.png

They did not provide the information until a few days before trial.

Who is Jordan Campbell?

Screenshot_20221013-174855.png (802.62 KiB) Viewed 453 times

[InfoWarrior82]

I heard it speculated that they first tried to tell them they couldn't get to it. Then the judge got mad and requested it again. They then sent screenshots. Then the judge defaulted.

That's at least much closer to the truth. Here's what happened:
Screenshot_20221013-171902.png

They did not provide the information until a few days before trial.

Who is Jordan Campbell?

Screenshot_20221013-174855.png

What happens to someone if they are found to lie in their sworn affidavit?

[Artaxerxes]

That's at least much closer to the truth. Here's what happened:
Screenshot_20221013-171902.png

They did not provide the information until a few days before trial.

Who is Jordan Campbell?

Screenshot_20221013-174855.png

What happens to someone if they are found to lie in their sworn affidavit?

The court can find them to be in contempt or they could be charged with perjury.

[InfoWarrior82]

Who is Jordan Campbell?

Screenshot_20221013-174855.png

What happens to someone if they are found to lie in their sworn affidavit?

The court can find them to be in contempt or they could be charged with perjury.

[oneClimbs]

When will the network news have to pay up for all the lies they tell daily?

When people can prove personal damages?

They don’t damage people directly, they aim more at entire civilizations as a whole.

[Artaxerxes]

Screenshot_20221013-174855.png

What happens to someone if they are found to lie in their sworn affidavit?

The court can find them to be in contempt or they could be charged with perjury.

Here is the screenshot that Jones's team provided of their analytics dashboard that they said couldn't possibly export data.

Screenshot_20221013-200024.png (630.01 KiB) Viewed 381 times

[InfoWarrior82]

What happens to someone if they are found to lie in their sworn affidavit?

The court can find them to be in contempt or they could be charged with perjury.

Here is the screenshot that Jones's team provided of their analytics dashboard that they said couldn't possibly export data.
Screenshot_20221013-200024.png

You can click the button but guess what pops up...

[Artaxerxes]

The court can find them to be in contempt or they could be charged with perjury.

Here is the screenshot that Jones's team provided of their analytics dashboard that they said couldn't possibly export data.
Screenshot_20221013-200024.png

You can click the button but guess what pops up...

This drop down:

Screenshot_20221013-203723.png (570.1 KiB) Viewed 349 times

[InfoWarrior82]

Here is the screenshot that Jones's team provided of their analytics dashboard that they said couldn't possibly export data.
Screenshot_20221013-200024.png

You can click the button but guess what pops up...

This drop down:
Screenshot_20221013-203723.png

And the function will only work if you're a GA360 subscriber, as I've already shown.

[Artaxerxes]

Here is the screenshot that Jones's team provided of their analytics dashboard that they said couldn't possibly export data.
Screenshot_20221013-200024.png

You can click the button but guess what pops up...

This drop down:
Screenshot_20221013-203723.png

And the function will only work if you're a GA360 subscriber, as I've already shown.

Nope. You can export different things with GA360. What they were supposed to disclose was exportable wut the basic plan.

Here's something that describes both ways to export.

https://easyinsights.ai/blog/the-best-w ... analytics/

[madvin]

This is a lie. This is the source of the corruption in this trial. He provided everything they wanted, and more. It was the only way they could railroad him.

You need to get outside your bubble and read what actually happened. For a nice starter, here's the judge sanctioning him in 2021 for not disclosing Google analytic data. https://www.courthousenews.com/sandy-ho ... -judgment/

Here's the judge sanctioning him against for STILL not disclosing the information .... in 2022. https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-punish ... 38400.html

So tell me again about how he provided them with everything?

From yahoo and courthouse news? No wonder you think the way you do.

Which part of it is wrong?

Aw c'mon. It's all one-sided. It makes NO attempt at reporting the other side. Although I don't particularly like Epoch Times, at least they do their job and report the way journalists should, not take talking points, attempting NO research and reporting the same old slant all the other "major" news sources use. It is very transparent. This is one of the ways brainwashing occurs. Believe me, we are all brainwashed to one degree or another, but getting your news from only those "major" sources will always get you off truth's path. Government doesn't lie and the major media sources always tell it straight. After all, they all say the same thing, so it must be true...

[Artaxerxes]

You need to get outside your bubble and read what actually happened. For a nice starter, here's the judge sanctioning him in 2021 for not disclosing Google analytic data. https://www.courthousenews.com/sandy-ho ... -judgment/

Here's the judge sanctioning him against for STILL not disclosing the information .... in 2022. https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-punish ... 38400.html

So tell me again about how he provided them with everything?

From yahoo and courthouse news? No wonder you think the way you do.

Which part of it is wrong?

Aw c'mon. It's all one-sided. It makes NO attempt at reporting the other side. Although I don't particularly like Epoch Times, at least they do their job and report the way journalists should, not take talking points, attempting NO research and reporting the same old slant all the other "major" news sources use. It is very transparent. This is one of the ways brainwashing occurs. Believe me, we are all brainwashed to one degree or another, but getting your news from only those "major" sources will always get you off truth's path. Government doesn't lie and the major media sources always tell it straight. After all, they all say the same thing, so it must be true...

What's the other side that they're missing?

[InfoWarrior82]

You can click the button but guess what pops up...

This drop down:
Screenshot_20221013-203723.png

And the function will only work if you're a GA360 subscriber, as I've already shown.

Nope. You can export different things with GA360. What they were supposed to disclose was exportable wut the basic plan.

Here's something that describes both ways to export.

https://easyinsights.ai/blog/the-best-w ... analytics/

Maybe the judge didn't like the 3 months of history you get in the free version.

[PeacefulProtests]

Funny I wonder how much Tony Hawk made on the deal playing his part

Or how about these two parents. Lost their daughter days before and not a single tear shed. Super weird

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToQNVJE4xgk

[Artaxerxes]

This drop down:
Screenshot_20221013-203723.png

And the function will only work if you're a GA360 subscriber, as I've already shown.

Nope. You can export different things with GA360. What they were supposed to disclose was exportable wut the basic plan.

Here's something that describes both ways to export.

https://easyinsights.ai/blog/the-best-w ... analytics/

Maybe the judge didn't like the 3 months of history you get in the free version.

No. They only gave over old data, nothing recent.

[InfoWarrior82]

And the function will only work if you're a GA360 subscriber, as I've already shown.

Nope. You can export different things with GA360. What they were supposed to disclose was exportable wut the basic plan.

Here's something that describes both ways to export.

https://easyinsights.ai/blog/the-best-w ... analytics/

Maybe the judge didn't like the 3 months of history you get in the free version.

No. They only gave over old data, nothing recent.

Link?

[Artaxerxes]

Nope. You can export different things with GA360. What they were supposed to disclose was exportable wut the basic plan.

Here's something that describes both ways to export.

https://easyinsights.ai/blog/the-best-w ... analytics/

Maybe the judge didn't like the 3 months of history you get in the free version.

No. They only gave over old data, nothing recent.

Link?

Screenshot_20221013-213720.png (71.27 KiB) Viewed 256 times

https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-punish ... 38400.html

[InfoWarrior82]

Maybe the judge didn't like the 3 months of history you get in the free version.

No. They only gave over old data, nothing recent.

Link?

Screenshot_20221013-213720.png
https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-punish ... 38400.html

Do you have a link to the discovery request and the date issued?

[Artaxerxes]

No. They only gave over old data, nothing recent.

Link?

Screenshot_20221013-213720.png
https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-punish ... 38400.html

Do you have a link to the discovery request and the date issued?

All of the court documents are here:
https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/LoadDoc ... 186046436S

[InfoWarrior82]

Link?

Screenshot_20221013-213720.png
https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-punish ... 38400.html

Do you have a link to the discovery request and the date issued?

All of the court documents are here:
https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/LoadDoc ... 186046436S

Dead link

[Artaxerxes]

Screenshot_20221013-213720.png
https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-punish ... 38400.html

Do you have a link to the discovery request and the date issued?

All of the court documents are here:
https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/LoadDoc ... 186046436S

Dead link

It's slow but it still works for me.

Screenshot_20221013-214930.png (449.86 KiB) Viewed 222 times

[InfoWarrior82]

Do you have a link to the discovery request and the date issued?

All of the court documents are here:
https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/LoadDoc ... 186046436S

Dead link

It's slow but it still works for me.
Screenshot_20221013-214930.png

The request for discovery on marketing data was issued on 12/10/2018. Whatever article you're reading from... that implies Jones should have turned over data from the past couple of years otherwise he should be held in contempt or should have the case defaulted... do you have a link to it?