How is it "overblown"? [/quote]
Loopholes.The line graph clearly shows that the term "died suddenly" is showing up in News articles at an exponential rate. This isn't just random people talking about it, but News articles being written about it. Compare that with the 40%+ increase in deaths in a single year in the insurance world, and you have something quite significant.
Most people have become overreliant on Google, even though some of us have repeatedly pointed out how much they censor. Google is a corrupt monopoly and has destroyed the competition. They are gatekeepers to the internet.
I mention above that they have a system called Owl which suppresses supposed "misinformation". This has been gradually getting worse by the year. Using Google's own data may be shooting yourself in the foot, because at some point in the near future, they're going to notice this loophole, and close it. Then someone will turn around in 2023 (or whenever) pointing out how much lower the figures are for that year...
The news media is much the same. There are several problems with news media:
* Duplicated content. Most news comes from agency copy or press releases. So someone can turn around and play that card, and say the figure is far lower, because there may be hundreds of articles about John Doe and Mary Smith.
* Suppressed content. As we already know, the media ISN'T reporting on a lot of these stories.
The joke is that only a fraction of cases are being reported on, but much of that fraction will consist of articles about the same stories.
The insurance angle is a much better one to go on, although they are ways that can be jerry-rigged too. In the near future, it may be worth finding how many been turned down for insurance for health reasons, rather than just how many claims there are. The insurance companies will need to protect themselves and anyone with arrhythmia, tachycardia, myocarditis etc will either have to pay monster premiums or be rejected.