Thinker wrote: ↑September 5th, 2021, 11:25 amPSY OPS “fact-checking” that seems to really be covering up legitimate concerns - denies covid shots have tracking. Yet…Niemand wrote: ↑September 5th, 2021, 3:54 amThey may end up being the McGuffin themselves. Because once you get them, you are added to a tracking ID which you will have to use on your smartphone in over a hundred countries... it is being introduced slowly and surely, without real debate. In some places, it's just a card, but that will change. Elsewhere they already talking about making it wearable.
”… Even before Covid-19, a variety of companies and nonprofits had been promoting the benefits of digital and biometric IDs. The need for a speedy and comprehensive vaccination campaign has further emboldened them, to the point that privacy and data security campaigners are increasingly discomfited. In May, after the executive director of ID2020, a sprawling alliance of organizations pushing for digital IDs, wrote a white paper calling for electronic “immunity certificates” for Covid-19, one of the group’s advisers quit, writing in her resignation email that the alliance just wanted to “promote decentralized identity solutions at all costs.”
There are a lot of psy ops going on. They have muddied the water by calling it a "passport" so many people thought it was for travel. Now people here in Scotland seem to think it's only for night clubs (which only makes sense as a means to make twenty somethings get the jabs.)
The other thing is to make the debate entirely about what is in the injections. There are serious concerns there, don't get me wrong, but not enough on the pass system that you get after the injections... which appears to be independent from them.